4 ms·
Title is sensationalist. Should be something like "Transition to Cyanogenmod.org"; Cyanogenmod is not offline, just cyanogenmod.com Google already give you cya
by lambda 14y ago
Title is sensationalist. Should be something like "Transition to Cyanogenmod.org"; Cyanogenmod is not offline, just cyanogenmod.com
Google already give you cyanogenmod.org when you search for cyanogenmod. Was this always their preferred domain, or is Google just that quick to update?
Post on cyanogenmod.org for those who prefer not to use Facebook: http://www.cyanogenmod.org/blog/psa-transition-to-cyanogenmod-org http://www.cyanogenmod.org/blog/psa-transition-to-cyanogenmo...
For the sake of posterity, the original title was "Cyanogenmod taken offline by developer", and the link was to the same story, but posted on Facebook.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- lambda 14y agoSensationalist because it is false, and misleads you in a way that makes you believe this is a bigger deal than it actually is. Nothing is offline. All that has changed is the domain. "Cyanogenmod" is not offline. "cyanogenmod.com" is offline, but everything that was there is at "cyanogenmod.org" so even saying "cyanogenmod.com is offline" would be misleading. Also, the "taken offline by developer" part is patently false. The website was taken offline by someone who donated the domain name, and is now using it to try and make affiliate deals and extort the developer. Really, there is an actually interesting story here. The title could be "cyanogenmod.com hijacked by rogue admin"; that is just as interesting, and actually true. Almost nothing about "Cyanogenmod taken offline by developer" is true.
- marshray 14y agoLooks to me like a lot of search results return cyanogenmod.com, which suggests that many bookmarks are now broken.
- lambda 14y agoI'm not saying that this isn't a big deal. I'm saying that the headline is false. It implies that Cyanogenmod itself has been taken down by its developer. That is not true at all. The domain name has been taken down by the person who donated in the first place, and is now trying to make a quick buck off of it. Sure, bookmarks may break. Yes, it's an important story. But Cyanogenmod has not been taken offline by its developer.
- myko 14y agoActually from the CM post: > Refusing to be extorted for funds, and then being threatened is “ending it bitter”? Today, it happened: all of our records were deleted, and cyanogenmod.com is slowly expiring out of the Internet and being replaced by blank pages and non-existing sites. @cyanogenmod.com e-mail is now being directed to a mailserver completely out of our control, too. At one point CyanogenMod.com was down. The title could be clearer on that for sure, but I don't think it was meant to be sensationalist.
- myko 14y agoIt isn't terribly sensationalist. Indeed a former team member is holding the domain hostage, it's not a simple transition by any means.
- jeffool 14y agoJust reading the title, I was under the impression that CyanogenMod itself was no longer available from the developer, not just the website. I'm not sure if "sensationalist" is the right word, but, it wouldn't pass an editor's muster.
- lambda 14y agoYes, perhaps "sensationalist" wasn't the right term; "false" would have been better. Cyanogenmod is not offline, and it wasn't the developer who took anything offline.
- myko 14y agoGood point about the old title saying 'by developer'. Probably since I knew what had happened already it didn't stand out to me, but I see how folks would think it meant Steve took it down. Again I don't think the title was meant to read that way, but yeah I agree that was not clear and the new title/direct link is much better.
- jeffool 14y agoOh I agree completely; I certainly don't think saket123 meant to mislead people at all. It was just an unfortunate choice of words causing a little bit of a dust up. Maybe now any relevant conversation can happen! So let's all go answer or up-vote philp's comment!
- notimetorelax 14y agoWell they want to know how many people were lied to, it is mentioned at the end.