3 ms·
Kimi K2.6 also released today. I think it's fair to compare the two models. Qwen appears to be much more expensive: - Qwen: $1.3 in / $7.8 out - Kimi: $0.95
by seanw265 6mo ago
Kimi K2.6 also released today. I think it's fair to compare the two models.
Qwen appears to be much more expensive:
- Qwen: $1.3 in / $7.8 out
- Kimi: $0.95 in / $4 out
--
The announcement posts only share two overlapping benchmark results. Qwen appears to score slightly lower on SWE-Bench Pro and Terminal-Bench 2.0.
Qwen:
- Teminal-Bench 2.0: 65.4
- SWE-Bench Pro: 57.3
Kimi:
- Terminal-Bench 2.0: 66.8
- SWE-Bench Pro: 58.6
--
Different models have different strong suits, and benchmarks don't cover everything. But from a numbers perspective, Kimi looks much more appealing.
- mchusma 6mo agoi think as the pricing has gone up on the Chinese models it has made them less appealing, and with the introduction of Gemma-4 not many are at the pareto frontier (also in my experience, not just the stats): https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text/overall?viewBy=plot https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text/overall?viewBy=plot
- chrisss395 5mo agoFWIW in my recent testing I couldn't find a better model than Gemma 4 31B for the price (openrouter only). My use case was taking discussions and identifying business ideas, so somewhat conceptual problem solving type thing.
- archon810 5mo agoI wonder if this means a better Cursor Composer model update is coming, since it builds on top of Kimi K2.
- 2001zhaozhao 5mo agoCursor would have to run their RL pipeline all over again if they wanted to build a new Composer on K2.6, so almost definitely not.
- archon810 5mo agoWhy wouldn't they? If they can tout improvements over Composer 2, it'll be worth the training cost.