4 ms·
Then read upthread https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47835184 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47835184 I just don't see why we can't have nice things u
by Aachen 6mo ago
Then read upthread https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47835184 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47835184
I just don't see why we can't have nice things until proven otherwise (especially considering there is already evidence that this works), rather than have glued-shut devices until proven otherwise (by whom then? Apparently IP and practical experiences aren't enough for you)
- syncsynchalt 6mo agoSamsung only rated the S5 Active as water resistant, and only IP67. We're talking about IP68, where you can take a new phone with you on a long swim.
- Aachen 6mo agoI clicked the "parent comment" link all the way to the submission, and opened the submission as well. Nothing mentions IP68. Which "we" is this goalpost coming from?
- throwaway27448 6mo agoI had an s5. It was neither waterproof nor even water resistant—the enclosure got too banged up to ensure seals stay sealed.
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]