4 ms·
You're proving the point. 1) iPhones for example are ip68 rated while those are just ipx8/9 2) Do you want to be limited to the universe of those search resul
by nonethewiser 6mo ago
You're proving the point.
1) iPhones for example are ip68 rated while those are just ipx8/9
2) Do you want to be limited to the universe of those search results? Do you want to buy a Sony Xperia?
You can't make batteries directly replaceable at the same quality and price. There are tradeoffs. Obviously waterproof non-embedded batteries exist. Just like you could make a removable battery the same slimness as embedded. With massive tradeoffs. It's capacity will be terrible. No one is surprised a removable battery can be waterproof but the point is there are tradeoffs.
- fsflover 6mo ago> just ipx8/9 Do you actually need it? For what?
- carefulfungi 6mo agoKinda weird to argue for longer life via battery replacement and against longer life via contaminant protections. My phone is regularly covered in chalk dust, sawdust, water, …
- 0-_-0 6mo ago1 mm thickness is a fine trade-off
- anonymars 6mo agoI don't see those options in the search results either way In any case we heard the same sort of rationalization for getting rid of the headphone jack, so color me extremely skeptical-- yes of course there's going to be trade-offs, but what a coincidence that headphone jacks, replaceable batteries, SD card slots have all gone by the wayside, which just so happens to allow for upselling Bluetooth and cloud storage