3 ms·

YOU are delusional, amigo. I literally give you a link that points out that what you're basing your beliefs on, is from some motivational speaker, pop-science,

YOU are delusional, amigo. I literally give you a link that points out that what you're basing your beliefs on, is from some motivational speaker, pop-science, borderline con-artist author. And you reply with... more anecdotes. Do you not see the irony? Are you incapable of reflecting on this? There are of course some statistical biological (hormonal, physiological, whatever) differences between women and men. But there are also statistical biological differences between... men! And we are not grouping men like this, except in caste systems or believers in racism. So why should we do this for women? Because it's extremely convenient for people like you, to have women classified as child-rearers and general house servants, and then retroactively explain that this is "natural" with anecdata and pseudoscience, and never having to make any real attempt at gender equality. No hay más ciego que el que no quiere ver...

anthk 6mo ago
>No hay más ciego... Le dijo la sarten al cazo. Yes, there are differences, and this is not pseudoscience. Nor hints about castes about races. https://www.uoc.edu/en/news/2023/286-gender-differences-in-visuospatial-abilities https://www.uoc.edu/en/news/2023/286-gender-differences-in-v... >why should we do this for women? Should we ban men from poetry/arts too? That would be dumb. In my case, Discrete Math and combinatorics where hell compared to other Math branches. Yet I could approach them from overlapping subjects. Women do the same, they applied different strategies and then they bound them together. This requieres effort for both genders? OFC, but that's the 'winning' strategy; the most different skills you gather, the better. Men prefer measure and rotate and women use nodes and graphs? How about using both by definning a lattice and placing easy nodes as helping points making orientation a breeze for both genders? Also, if you negate any difference, how come men and women tend to lose different brain sections upon dementia/Alzheimer?
- the_gipsy 6mo ago
  > Should we ban men from poetry/arts too? That would be dumb. Exactly, so please stop with the "women are better at [whatever task you don't want to deal with]" stereotypes. It's all pseudoscience, trying to find some "natural" or biological basis for oppressing people, just like racism.
  - anthk 6mo ago
    No, is not pseudoscience, it's called 'hormones'. Your discourse it's a bit antropocentric. We aren't special for the Physics in the universe, nor we have free will. Again, I don't care about either left or right wing beliefs. Hormones' influence it's pretty real. In order to avoid oppresions, we have the law systems, thank you.
    - the_gipsy 6mo ago
      It's not enough!

anthk 6mo ago

>No hay más ciego... Le dijo la sarten al cazo. Yes, there are differences, and this is not pseudoscience. Nor hints about castes about races. https://www.uoc.edu/en/news/2023/286-gender-differences-in-visuospatial-abilities https://www.uoc.edu/en/news/2023/286-gender-differences-in-v... >why should we do this for women? Should we ban men from poetry/arts too? That would be dumb. In my case, Discrete Math and combinatorics where hell compared to other Math branches. Yet I could approach them from overlapping subjects. Women do the same, they applied different strategies and then they bound them together. This requieres effort for both genders? OFC, but that's the 'winning' strategy; the most different skills you gather, the better. Men prefer measure and rotate and women use nodes and graphs? How about using both by definning a lattice and placing easy nodes as helping points making orientation a breeze for both genders? Also, if you negate any difference, how come men and women tend to lose different brain sections upon dementia/Alzheimer?

the_gipsy 6mo ago
> Should we ban men from poetry/arts too? That would be dumb. Exactly, so please stop with the "women are better at [whatever task you don't want to deal with]" stereotypes. It's all pseudoscience, trying to find some "natural" or biological basis for oppressing people, just like racism.
- anthk 6mo ago
  No, is not pseudoscience, it's called 'hormones'. Your discourse it's a bit antropocentric. We aren't special for the Physics in the universe, nor we have free will. Again, I don't care about either left or right wing beliefs. Hormones' influence it's pretty real. In order to avoid oppresions, we have the law systems, thank you.
  - the_gipsy 6mo ago
    It's not enough!