17 ms·

Dole/Kemp '96 Online Campaign

139 points by bdz 14y ago

wallawe 14y ago
"DEBATE MENTION OF WEB SITE CAUSES FLOOD OF VISITORS" Goes on to say that the site received more than 762,000 "hits" in a four hour period: http://www.dolekemp96.org/news/releases/proct0796a.htm http://www.dolekemp96.org/news/releases/proct0796a.htm edit: hours
- artursapek 14y ago
  It says four hours, not days.
- cpeterso 14y ago
  Before I read the link, I thought those 762,000 hits were HN users over the last four hours. :)
ssharp 14y ago
There is a link at the bottom of the page to: http://www.4president.org/ http://www.4president.org/ This site has archives of campaign websites, website features, and campaign ads. I think it's fascinating to see the paradigm shifts in web design indicated by these four-year gaps. And campaigns being a temporary thing, I think they perfectly encapsulate the design of the "era". I was going through the years and was thinking "sure, a lot changed from 1996 to 2000, so of course the sites will look a lot different but there is no way 2008 is that much different than 2012". Wrong. I think this is just what happens when you see web design evolve slowly over four years -- you don't think it's changed that much. Then you actually see a site in 2008 vs. 2012 and realize the difference. The 1996 Phil Graham and Pat Buchanan sites look like classic Geocities-style design! The stark differences in design of the nominated candidates vs. the ones who lost in the primaries. This gap seems to have been most apparent in 1996 and 2000, during the bubble, when top-tier web designers were probably insanely expensive.
- tharris0101 14y ago
  I think the biggest aesthetic change was between 04 and 08 which makes sense sine that was the era that so-called "Web 2.0" took off.
tocomment 14y ago
So what is it about this design that makes it look "dated"? It's not just the grainy images, right? Is it the smaller text? More compact style?
- Sumaso 14y ago
 I was just thinking if they had some high res images, and bumped up the font size, it wouldn't be half bad. Of course this comes from a person with little knowledge of web design.
- RyanMcGreal 14y ago
 I was thinking it holds up quite well, compared to my subjective memory of websites from that vintage. There are no scrolling banners or other dancing garbage (with the exception of one animated GIF that is relatively restrained), and the layout wouldn't look out of place today if the elements had a bit more room to breathe. Even the markup is surprisingly clean: * Most tag names are lowercase * Attributes are double-quoted * Some style attributes with CSS I'm surprised to see FrontPage generated this code - I remember it being more gnarly than this. That said, I'm enjoying the historical artifacts: * Table-based layout * tags * <body> tag has background, vlink and alink attributes * URLs apparently map to actual HTML files
 - Maakuth 14y ago
 The tightness of the layout probably stems from low resolution screens. In '96 the most typical display size was something around 640x480 or 800x600, not a lot of room to breathe there.
 - atsaloli 14y ago
 In the last month, I've had 2 people tell me (unsolicited of course) that my website looks like it was made 10 years ago. I went to this 1996 campaign site and said with dismay, it looks like my website. I recognized many of of the above historical attributes (table-based layout, centered narrow, body bgcolor attribute) in my own site. I've got a full-time job as a UNIX system administrator, and a part-time business training sys admins. I don't have the website redesign merit badge or time to earn one. I'd pay for a redesign but I don't even know what to ask for except "a website that presents my company well". And I want people to stop staring at my website like there is something wrong with it. Would appreciate any help you can offer, either by recommending a designer or a design, please.
robocaptain 14y ago
One way it reads very different to me is the way all of the sources are (in parenthesis) directly after the statements. I don't read a lot of campaign websites but I've not seen one that has so many direct sources for this many statements. It's quite refreshing actually.
DoubleMalt 14y ago
Looks like the high school homepage I did in 1994 when in 10th grade ;)
DrinkWater 14y ago
hooray for http://www.dolekemp96.org/about/cookies/cookies.html http://www.dolekemp96.org/about/cookies/cookies.html
- tronicron 14y ago
  Cookie recipe! #winning
xyzzyb 14y ago
Ahh, 1996 was an awesome year for websites. Space Jam: http://www2.warnerbros.com/spacejam/ http://www2.warnerbros.com/spacejam/
- _mayo 14y ago
  It looks like it was updated in 2003.
  - bdz 14y ago
    That's the original from 1996 http://www2.warnerbros.com/spacejam/movie/jam.htm http://www2.warnerbros.com/spacejam/movie/jam.htm
  - xyzzyb 14y ago
    Aww, that's a shame. The old site is a level down: http://www2.warnerbros.com/spacejam/movie/jam.htm http://www2.warnerbros.com/spacejam/movie/jam.htm
- napoleoncomplex 14y ago
  I've always wondered, what's the best looking website of the 1990s? Was there anything that people would deem as "good" as some of today's top designs? I feel like there had to be at least someone with a very refined sense of aesthetic making awesome websites back then.
  - xyzzyb 14y ago
    At the time the web was only a couple of years old and it was yet to even hit the "lets get serious" radar of just about everyone. Essentially, no. There was no one with a very refined aesthetic making websites at the time. Even the Louvre's website (one of the first art museum websites I remember popping up) was extremely ugly.
  - dccoolgai 14y ago
    Drudge Report. Even if you don't like the political "lean" of it (I, personally, don't), you have to appreciate a design that has (basically) stayed the same since it was founded in the mid 90s. The "minimalism" from Drudge had a big impact on a lot of modern web design.
tmgrhm 14y ago
Complete with the security of '96: http://www.dolekemp96.org/divider.gi http://www.dolekemp96.org/divider.gi [Intentionally broken link]
- duck 14y ago
  Say hello to IIS7.
- Firehed 14y ago
  > \\brainiac.ad.safesecureweb.com\websites\192620cbc\dolekemp96.org\divider.gi Safesecureweb.com. Heh. Although other than knowing it's running IIS (which is in the Server header of the responses anyway), it's not particularly useful. Unlike modern web apps, it's not displaying a stack trace or debug information that contains db connection strings and the like. Also, this is fixed by changing one line in web.config AFAIK (it's been a good five years since I worked with IIS in any capacity)
dan_yall 14y ago
Well done, and not all that dated looking. Although, in my head, everything on that website reads in the voice of Norm MacDonald's Bob Dole impression.
- manuscreationis 14y ago
  I thought I was the only one...
pzaich 14y ago
Found this gem on the news page http://www.dolekemp96.org/praug296.htm http://www.dolekemp96.org/praug296.htm > "There's no doubt we'll look back at Web sites today and basically say ... that they were quite primitive. They don't customize what they present to the viewers' interests. They don't remember: Have you been there before? What have you seen before? And that's got to change." -- Bill Gates, MSNBC, July 15, 1996 How right he was!
freehunter 14y ago
Blocked by McAfee Web Gateway as pornography. Interesting.
- pokstad 14y ago
  Same here. Now I'm going to get fired. Thanks HN.
mochizuki 14y ago
"Bill Clinton Wants to Put 'Big Brother' in Your Computer" Haha! http://www.dolekemp96.org/agenda/issues/internet.htm http://www.dolekemp96.org/agenda/issues/internet.htm
- danesparza 14y ago
  Actually, this was a pretty big deal to the Electronic Frontier Foundation back in the day. More information: https://w2.eff.org/Privacy/Key_escrow/Clipper/ https://w2.eff.org/Privacy/Key_escrow/Clipper/
sequoia 14y ago
from the commercials page ( http://www.dolekemp96.org/news/commercials/commercials.html http://www.dolekemp96.org/news/commercials/commercials.html ), in reference to the bad Clinton economy that Dole would fix: Two incomes needed to make ends meet. Not sure whether to laugh or to cry, thinking that just a while ago a politician called attention to this as though it were a fixable problem...were things really so different 16 years ago?
- Spooky23 14y ago
  Yup. Lots more blue-collar jobs with pensions. '96 was 'pre-China' for more sophisticated manufacturing.
MatthewPhillips 14y ago
I wish sites were still designed this way. Not the animated gifs or the font size 1, but the fact that once the site is loaded, it's completely done. And if I refresh the page, or bookmark the link and come back later, I'm going to see the exact same page. According to the Chrome developer tools the page took 2ms to render and 4ms to paint. I write JavaScript professionally but not all web sites need JavaScript, in fact most do not. Compare this site with a random page from the ReadWrite's new design[1] which doesn't even load its initial content until after the page has loaded (!) and gives 50% of its x axis to ads and links to other unrelated pages on the site (which contain more ads of course). I don't want informational websites to continue to load stuff a second or five seconds after the page has loaded. I don't want them to load new content when my mouse floats over a div. I don't want a sitemap that is omnipresent as I scroll down an article. I'm a big fan of the Contrast Rebellion[2] and kind of feel like something in the same spirit is needed for static websites. I miss the non-interactive web. [1]http://readwrite.com/2012/11/14/if-foxconn-replaced-its-humans-with-robots-would-you-feel-better http://readwrite.com/2012/11/14/if-foxconn-replaced-its-huma... [2]http://contrastrebellion.com/ http://contrastrebellion.com/
- Pewpewarrows 14y ago
  I'm in the same boat as you. I absolutely _love_ developing sites JavaScript-free on the first pass. It really makes you realize how much of a crutch it's been that you've depended on, and how much you can get away with these days without it, especially with the rise of newer CSS features in the last couple of years. At the end of the day you're left with a very fast and clean site that you can, after careful consideration, add very tiny JS snippets to in order to improve UX in places.
- sspiff 14y ago
  I my main monitor in portrait mode. The ReadWrite site is absolutely horrible this way.
- tharris0101 14y ago
  I'm with you for the most part but I find that #fff background with #000 text is pretty harsh on my eyes. I think there is a sweet spot somewhere in the middle. The biggest problem with readability for me lately is awful Google Fonts which never render right.
rangibaby 14y ago
This is quite nice for a 1996 website. I guess it shows how much the development of (nice) web design was held back by a combination of the ~2000 flashpocalypse and IE6. I felt quite nostalgic looking at the designs from this era: http://www.4president.us/2000websites.htm http://www.4president.us/2000websites.htm Luckily, there is a certain font present that will stop you from feeling too sentimental. :-)
- acuozzo 14y ago
  Also: http://www.4president.us/1996websites.htm http://www.4president.us/1996websites.htm
jdalgetty 14y ago
It's nice how quickly everything loads.
- samwilliams 14y ago
  It loads quickly now, but at 75kb on a 28k dial up modem that would have taken ~21 seconds!
danso 14y ago
I was going to ask: "so how is it that the average non-commercial site can be expected to crash upon reaching ten HN upvotes but this 1996 is still chugging along strong" After all, this was well before such thing as CDNs were in wide use. Then I looked at the source and saw that it's a Frontpage site. * This brings back memories of when you could get at least $50/hr to make something like this.
- brazzy 14y ago
  The average non-commercial site these days is based on an unoptimized Wordpress installation that loads 137 PHP files and does 18 DB reqests to render its main page. This 1996 gem is entirely static content. That's a few orders of magnitude less work for the server to do right there. And it runs on IIS 7, so the the hardware and software that does the actual work is most definitely NOT from 1996.
  - derleth 14y ago
    > And it runs on IIS 7, so the the hardware and software that does the actual work is most definitely NOT from 1996. And this is the big thing right here. We're running sites designed to be basically usable when served by 1996 hardware on systems orders of magnitude faster with almost two decades' worth of optimizations compared to what was acceptable in 1996. I don't know how much NTFS has changed since then, but filesystems in the Linux world have undergone a sea change in that timeframe, which is directly relevant to how quickly a static page can be served.
    - Firehed 14y ago
      I imagine the only real thing at play here is the number of connections the server software is configured to handle. This site has a small handful of small static assets: there's no server-side render, and I'd put money on everything being cached even if no such server-side optimizations have been made (done at the disk and/or OS level). I'd bet the only limiting factor of '96 hardware would be the NIC, all else being equal. Webserver software was a lot less complicated back then, so its memory footprint was far smaller.
boh 14y ago
My work computer categorized the site as pornography Access Denied!
- vraylle 14y ago
  Ditto, hope the men in suits don't come down.
brown9-2 14y ago
Makes you wonder who, if anyone, is still paying to host the site. Someone must be keeping it online on purpose, right?
- dagw 14y ago
  I don't have a hard time believing that someone signed up for some sort of annual billing and never bothered to cancel it. Perhaps they host a whole bunch of stuff with the same company and simply pay their bills without double checking ever line item.
- michaelt 14y ago
  Domain whois shows it's registered to "4President Corporation" and it shares a host with http://4president.org/ http://4president.org/ with provider 'hostmysite'. Looks like this is someone's intentional effort to archive these things.
  - cpeterso 14y ago
    Was dolekemp96.org the original website? whois says the domain was registered in 2003 and archive.org first crawled the site in 2001. Domain Name:DOLEKEMP96.ORG Created On:27-May-2003 14:15:22 UTC Last Updated On:25-Jan-2012 00:36:47 UTC
    - Firehed 14y ago
      If the domain lapses and is re-sold (not just transfered, but actually deleted and re-created), you can expect to see the newer created time. It could also be the registrar serving up wacky WHOIS info.
ten4backdoor 14y ago
Total badass. A few months ago I saw a gallery of screenshots taken from 'wayback machine' of a whole bunch of old websites. Netflix, Dell, and Apple look COMPLETELY different. What's surprising (or maybe not) is that Amazon 7 years ago looks almost exactly the same. Thanks for sharing the Dole / Kemp campaign site - brings back fond memories. Heres's the gallery if you're interested... http://www.shopify.com/blog/6464492-the-ecommerce-graveyard-how-37-popular-sites-used-to-look http://www.shopify.com/blog/6464492-the-ecommerce-graveyard-...
imjared 14y ago
Bit of mudslinging going on about a "clipper chip." I was much too young to really know what was going on with this (can read up on it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip), but it's interesting to see that there were security concerns in 1996 similar to the ones we have in 2012. http://www.dolekemp96.org/agenda/issues/internet.htm http://www.dolekemp96.org/agenda/issues/internet.htm
- neilk 14y ago
  That's a good thing for today's hackers and activists to review. It shows the long-term agenda of the government in wanting to have ubiquitous surveillance powers. And it shows you can win some of these battles. Can you imagine a web without SSL? Today people openly call for all sites to do https all the time, but in the 90s, a web server (or even a web browser) that could do https in a non-broken fashion was officially a dangerous munition. To do this basic thing you had to cobble some open source software together, kind of like how people do it with ffmpeg and implementations of closed-source codecs today. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_cryptography_in_the_United_States http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_cryptography_in_the_U...
yuvadam 14y ago
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 6.0"> I rest my case.
systematical 14y ago
Awesome. Another internet time capsule!
spinchange 14y ago
"Like no President since Lincoln, he will bring to the Presidency the values and principles of all Americans." Politicians have always and will always make great claims and comparisons and appeals to authority, history, etc., but I can't imagine a modern campaign (on either side) just flat our saying our guy is the best thing since Lincoln.
- pyre 14y ago
  Well, Bob Dole's campaign didn't have to deal with movies like "Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter" or "Abraham Lincoln vs. Zombies." Though maybe "Bob Dole: Liberal Slayer" would have been a better campaign platform? ;-)
- Zimahl 14y ago
  Considering in hindsight he was a great man who made the right decisions at the time, in his era Lincoln was such a polarizing figure.
- brudgers 14y ago
  I can't imagine a Republican of recent years running on this sort of environmental record: http://www.dolekemp96.org/agenda/issues/environment.htm http://www.dolekemp96.org/agenda/issues/environment.htm Then again, I increasingly have trouble imagining a Democrat doing so, either. I miss the World War II veterans in U.S. politics.
  - scarmig 14y ago
    Or this: http://www.dolekemp96.org/agenda/issues/civil.htm http://www.dolekemp96.org/agenda/issues/civil.htm And today far too many people are salivating at the idea of gutting the Voting Rights Act. On the other hand, one of the longest pages is on the drug war (in support of extending and intensifying it). It's hard to imagine a Republican making that a central plank in their platform, either.
deleted 14y ago
[deleted]
marshray 14y ago
http://www.dolekemp96.org/news/releases/proct0796a.htm http://www.dolekemp96.org/news/releases/proct0796a.htm "DEBATE MENTION OF WEB SITE CAUSES FLOOD OF VISITORS -- Site Receives More Than 762,000 Hits in Single Four-Hour Period Today"
joaco 14y ago
I'm loving this language "Believe that? America can do better. Bob Dole. Jack Kemp. Cutting income taxes on every family 15%. A 500 dollar per child tax credit. Higher take home pay. Bob Dole. Cut taxes. Balance the budget. Raise take home pay. Tell the truth."
awwstn 14y ago
I wonder if they took online donations through the site. I see the donations link, but maybe it gave a phone number/address rather than a cc form.
cedricd 14y ago
What's interesting to me about these old sites is how bad the typography is. Why is it that sites started using decent typefaces only relatively recently? Print design was just as well understood back then.
tongtongbaby 14y ago
we are company, main products Wigs,False Eyelashes,Remy Hair Extensions,Indian Remy Hair Extensions,Stock Hair <a href="http://www.allbeautybox.com>http://www.allbeautybox.com</a&#62 http://www.allbeautybox.com>http://www.allbeautybox.com&...; Piece,Print Hair Extensions,Fashion Jewelry..... they are 100% original and brand new with cheap price. the our company have different kinds, there have males, females also girls needing, products are suit for different groups of people, maybe there is something you are just waiting for. To some people love jewelrys, sure this is the good news for you, our company because our company <a href="http://www.allbeautybox.com>Remy http://www.allbeautybox.com>Remy Hair Extensions</a> is a manufactures, so our company can be <a href="http://www.allbeautybox.com>lace http://www.allbeautybox.com>lace front wigs</a> sure you are the only one to be focus on the world, the most <a href="http://www.allbeautybox.com>False http://www.allbeautybox.com>False Eyelashes</a> important, these are the jewelrys and fashion and design. our company also have the Do you feeling amazing, then go and action, our company will take best services waiting for <a href="http://www.allbeautybox.com>Fashion http://www.allbeautybox.com>Fashion Jewelrys</a> you ! Important!!: our company accept safe payment, like Paypal.... do fast shipping , sure we protect our clients privacy, make order to our company, you get the safe business and privacy !!!!!

139 points by bdz 14y ago

"DEBATE MENTION OF WEB SITE CAUSES FLOOD OF VISITORS" Goes on to say that the site received more than 762,000 "hits" in a four hour period: http://www.dolekemp96.org/news/releases/proct0796a.htm http://www.dolekemp96.org/news/releases/proct0796a.htm edit: hours

artursapek 14y ago
It says four hours, not days.
cpeterso 14y ago
Before I read the link, I thought those 762,000 hits were HN users over the last four hours. :)

ssharp 14y ago

There is a link at the bottom of the page to: http://www.4president.org/ http://www.4president.org/ This site has archives of campaign websites, website features, and campaign ads. I think it's fascinating to see the paradigm shifts in web design indicated by these four-year gaps. And campaigns being a temporary thing, I think they perfectly encapsulate the design of the "era". I was going through the years and was thinking "sure, a lot changed from 1996 to 2000, so of course the sites will look a lot different but there is no way 2008 is that much different than 2012". Wrong. I think this is just what happens when you see web design evolve slowly over four years -- you don't think it's changed that much. Then you actually see a site in 2008 vs. 2012 and realize the difference. The 1996 Phil Graham and Pat Buchanan sites look like classic Geocities-style design! The stark differences in design of the nominated candidates vs. the ones who lost in the primaries. This gap seems to have been most apparent in 1996 and 2000, during the bubble, when top-tier web designers were probably insanely expensive.

tharris0101 14y ago
I think the biggest aesthetic change was between 04 and 08 which makes sense sine that was the era that so-called "Web 2.0" took off.

tocomment 14y ago

So what is it about this design that makes it look "dated"? It's not just the grainy images, right? Is it the smaller text? More compact style?

Sumaso 14y ago
I was just thinking if they had some high res images, and bumped up the font size, it wouldn't be half bad. Of course this comes from a person with little knowledge of web design.
RyanMcGreal 14y ago
I was thinking it holds up quite well, compared to my subjective memory of websites from that vintage. There are no scrolling banners or other dancing garbage (with the exception of one animated GIF that is relatively restrained), and the layout wouldn't look out of place today if the elements had a bit more room to breathe. Even the markup is surprisingly clean: * Most tag names are lowercase * Attributes are double-quoted * Some style attributes with CSS I'm surprised to see FrontPage generated this code - I remember it being more gnarly than this. That said, I'm enjoying the historical artifacts: * Table-based layout * tags * <body> tag has background, vlink and alink attributes * URLs apparently map to actual HTML files
- Maakuth 14y ago
 The tightness of the layout probably stems from low resolution screens. In '96 the most typical display size was something around 640x480 or 800x600, not a lot of room to breathe there.
 - atsaloli 14y ago
 In the last month, I've had 2 people tell me (unsolicited of course) that my website looks like it was made 10 years ago. I went to this 1996 campaign site and said with dismay, it looks like my website. I recognized many of of the above historical attributes (table-based layout, centered narrow, body bgcolor attribute) in my own site. I've got a full-time job as a UNIX system administrator, and a part-time business training sys admins. I don't have the website redesign merit badge or time to earn one. I'd pay for a redesign but I don't even know what to ask for except "a website that presents my company well". And I want people to stop staring at my website like there is something wrong with it. Would appreciate any help you can offer, either by recommending a designer or a design, please.

robocaptain 14y ago

One way it reads very different to me is the way all of the sources are (in parenthesis) directly after the statements. I don't read a lot of campaign websites but I've not seen one that has so many direct sources for this many statements. It's quite refreshing actually.

DoubleMalt 14y ago

Looks like the high school homepage I did in 1994 when in 10th grade ;)

DrinkWater 14y ago

hooray for http://www.dolekemp96.org/about/cookies/cookies.html http://www.dolekemp96.org/about/cookies/cookies.html

tronicron 14y ago
Cookie recipe! #winning

xyzzyb 14y ago

Ahh, 1996 was an awesome year for websites. Space Jam: http://www2.warnerbros.com/spacejam/ http://www2.warnerbros.com/spacejam/

_mayo 14y ago
It looks like it was updated in 2003.
- bdz 14y ago
  That's the original from 1996 http://www2.warnerbros.com/spacejam/movie/jam.htm http://www2.warnerbros.com/spacejam/movie/jam.htm
- xyzzyb 14y ago
  Aww, that's a shame. The old site is a level down: http://www2.warnerbros.com/spacejam/movie/jam.htm http://www2.warnerbros.com/spacejam/movie/jam.htm
napoleoncomplex 14y ago
I've always wondered, what's the best looking website of the 1990s? Was there anything that people would deem as "good" as some of today's top designs? I feel like there had to be at least someone with a very refined sense of aesthetic making awesome websites back then.
- xyzzyb 14y ago
  At the time the web was only a couple of years old and it was yet to even hit the "lets get serious" radar of just about everyone. Essentially, no. There was no one with a very refined aesthetic making websites at the time. Even the Louvre's website (one of the first art museum websites I remember popping up) was extremely ugly.
- dccoolgai 14y ago
  Drudge Report. Even if you don't like the political "lean" of it (I, personally, don't), you have to appreciate a design that has (basically) stayed the same since it was founded in the mid 90s. The "minimalism" from Drudge had a big impact on a lot of modern web design.

tmgrhm 14y ago

Complete with the security of '96: http://www.dolekemp96.org/divider.gi http://www.dolekemp96.org/divider.gi [Intentionally broken link]

duck 14y ago
Say hello to IIS7.
Firehed 14y ago
> \\brainiac.ad.safesecureweb.com\websites\192620cbc\dolekemp96.org\divider.gi Safesecureweb.com. Heh. Although other than knowing it's running IIS (which is in the Server header of the responses anyway), it's not particularly useful. Unlike modern web apps, it's not displaying a stack trace or debug information that contains db connection strings and the like. Also, this is fixed by changing one line in web.config AFAIK (it's been a good five years since I worked with IIS in any capacity)

dan_yall 14y ago

Well done, and not all that dated looking. Although, in my head, everything on that website reads in the voice of Norm MacDonald's Bob Dole impression.

manuscreationis 14y ago
I thought I was the only one...

pzaich 14y ago

Found this gem on the news page http://www.dolekemp96.org/praug296.htm http://www.dolekemp96.org/praug296.htm > "There's no doubt we'll look back at Web sites today and basically say ... that they were quite primitive. They don't customize what they present to the viewers' interests. They don't remember: Have you been there before? What have you seen before? And that's got to change." -- Bill Gates, MSNBC, July 15, 1996 How right he was!

freehunter 14y ago

Blocked by McAfee Web Gateway as pornography. Interesting.

pokstad 14y ago
Same here. Now I'm going to get fired. Thanks HN.

mochizuki 14y ago

"Bill Clinton Wants to Put 'Big Brother' in Your Computer" Haha! http://www.dolekemp96.org/agenda/issues/internet.htm http://www.dolekemp96.org/agenda/issues/internet.htm

danesparza 14y ago
Actually, this was a pretty big deal to the Electronic Frontier Foundation back in the day. More information: https://w2.eff.org/Privacy/Key_escrow/Clipper/ https://w2.eff.org/Privacy/Key_escrow/Clipper/

sequoia 14y ago

from the commercials page ( http://www.dolekemp96.org/news/commercials/commercials.html http://www.dolekemp96.org/news/commercials/commercials.html ), in reference to the bad Clinton economy that Dole would fix: Two incomes needed to make ends meet. Not sure whether to laugh or to cry, thinking that just a while ago a politician called attention to this as though it were a fixable problem...were things really so different 16 years ago?

Spooky23 14y ago
Yup. Lots more blue-collar jobs with pensions. '96 was 'pre-China' for more sophisticated manufacturing.

MatthewPhillips 14y ago

I wish sites were still designed this way. Not the animated gifs or the font size 1, but the fact that once the site is loaded, it's completely done. And if I refresh the page, or bookmark the link and come back later, I'm going to see the exact same page. According to the Chrome developer tools the page took 2ms to render and 4ms to paint. I write JavaScript professionally but not all web sites need JavaScript, in fact most do not. Compare this site with a random page from the ReadWrite's new design[1] which doesn't even load its initial content until after the page has loaded (!) and gives 50% of its x axis to ads and links to other unrelated pages on the site (which contain more ads of course). I don't want informational websites to continue to load stuff a second or five seconds after the page has loaded. I don't want them to load new content when my mouse floats over a div. I don't want a sitemap that is omnipresent as I scroll down an article. I'm a big fan of the Contrast Rebellion[2] and kind of feel like something in the same spirit is needed for static websites. I miss the non-interactive web. [1]http://readwrite.com/2012/11/14/if-foxconn-replaced-its-humans-with-robots-would-you-feel-better http://readwrite.com/2012/11/14/if-foxconn-replaced-its-huma... [2]http://contrastrebellion.com/ http://contrastrebellion.com/

Pewpewarrows 14y ago
I'm in the same boat as you. I absolutely _love_ developing sites JavaScript-free on the first pass. It really makes you realize how much of a crutch it's been that you've depended on, and how much you can get away with these days without it, especially with the rise of newer CSS features in the last couple of years. At the end of the day you're left with a very fast and clean site that you can, after careful consideration, add very tiny JS snippets to in order to improve UX in places.
sspiff 14y ago
I my main monitor in portrait mode. The ReadWrite site is absolutely horrible this way.
tharris0101 14y ago
I'm with you for the most part but I find that #fff background with #000 text is pretty harsh on my eyes. I think there is a sweet spot somewhere in the middle. The biggest problem with readability for me lately is awful Google Fonts which never render right.

rangibaby 14y ago

This is quite nice for a 1996 website. I guess it shows how much the development of (nice) web design was held back by a combination of the ~2000 flashpocalypse and IE6. I felt quite nostalgic looking at the designs from this era: http://www.4president.us/2000websites.htm http://www.4president.us/2000websites.htm Luckily, there is a certain font present that will stop you from feeling too sentimental. :-)

acuozzo 14y ago
Also: http://www.4president.us/1996websites.htm http://www.4president.us/1996websites.htm

jdalgetty 14y ago

It's nice how quickly everything loads.

samwilliams 14y ago
It loads quickly now, but at 75kb on a 28k dial up modem that would have taken ~21 seconds!

danso 14y ago

I was going to ask: "so how is it that the average non-commercial site can be expected to crash upon reaching ten HN upvotes but this 1996 is still chugging along strong" After all, this was well before such thing as CDNs were in wide use. Then I looked at the source and saw that it's a Frontpage site. * This brings back memories of when you could get at least $50/hr to make something like this.

brazzy 14y ago
The average non-commercial site these days is based on an unoptimized Wordpress installation that loads 137 PHP files and does 18 DB reqests to render its main page. This 1996 gem is entirely static content. That's a few orders of magnitude less work for the server to do right there. And it runs on IIS 7, so the the hardware and software that does the actual work is most definitely NOT from 1996.
- derleth 14y ago
  > And it runs on IIS 7, so the the hardware and software that does the actual work is most definitely NOT from 1996. And this is the big thing right here. We're running sites designed to be basically usable when served by 1996 hardware on systems orders of magnitude faster with almost two decades' worth of optimizations compared to what was acceptable in 1996. I don't know how much NTFS has changed since then, but filesystems in the Linux world have undergone a sea change in that timeframe, which is directly relevant to how quickly a static page can be served.
  - Firehed 14y ago
    I imagine the only real thing at play here is the number of connections the server software is configured to handle. This site has a small handful of small static assets: there's no server-side render, and I'd put money on everything being cached even if no such server-side optimizations have been made (done at the disk and/or OS level). I'd bet the only limiting factor of '96 hardware would be the NIC, all else being equal. Webserver software was a lot less complicated back then, so its memory footprint was far smaller.

boh 14y ago

My work computer categorized the site as pornography Access Denied!

vraylle 14y ago
Ditto, hope the men in suits don't come down.

brown9-2 14y ago

Makes you wonder who, if anyone, is still paying to host the site. Someone must be keeping it online on purpose, right?

dagw 14y ago
I don't have a hard time believing that someone signed up for some sort of annual billing and never bothered to cancel it. Perhaps they host a whole bunch of stuff with the same company and simply pay their bills without double checking ever line item.
michaelt 14y ago
Domain whois shows it's registered to "4President Corporation" and it shares a host with http://4president.org/ http://4president.org/ with provider 'hostmysite'. Looks like this is someone's intentional effort to archive these things.
- cpeterso 14y ago
  Was dolekemp96.org the original website? whois says the domain was registered in 2003 and archive.org first crawled the site in 2001. Domain Name:DOLEKEMP96.ORG Created On:27-May-2003 14:15:22 UTC Last Updated On:25-Jan-2012 00:36:47 UTC
  - Firehed 14y ago
    If the domain lapses and is re-sold (not just transfered, but actually deleted and re-created), you can expect to see the newer created time. It could also be the registrar serving up wacky WHOIS info.

ten4backdoor 14y ago

Total badass. A few months ago I saw a gallery of screenshots taken from 'wayback machine' of a whole bunch of old websites. Netflix, Dell, and Apple look COMPLETELY different. What's surprising (or maybe not) is that Amazon 7 years ago looks almost exactly the same. Thanks for sharing the Dole / Kemp campaign site - brings back fond memories. Heres's the gallery if you're interested... http://www.shopify.com/blog/6464492-the-ecommerce-graveyard-how-37-popular-sites-used-to-look http://www.shopify.com/blog/6464492-the-ecommerce-graveyard-...

imjared 14y ago

Bit of mudslinging going on about a "clipper chip." I was much too young to really know what was going on with this (can read up on it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip), but it's interesting to see that there were security concerns in 1996 similar to the ones we have in 2012. http://www.dolekemp96.org/agenda/issues/internet.htm http://www.dolekemp96.org/agenda/issues/internet.htm

neilk 14y ago
That's a good thing for today's hackers and activists to review. It shows the long-term agenda of the government in wanting to have ubiquitous surveillance powers. And it shows you can win some of these battles. Can you imagine a web without SSL? Today people openly call for all sites to do https all the time, but in the 90s, a web server (or even a web browser) that could do https in a non-broken fashion was officially a dangerous munition. To do this basic thing you had to cobble some open source software together, kind of like how people do it with ffmpeg and implementations of closed-source codecs today. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_cryptography_in_the_United_States http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_cryptography_in_the_U...

yuvadam 14y ago

systematical 14y ago

Awesome. Another internet time capsule!

spinchange 14y ago

"Like no President since Lincoln, he will bring to the Presidency the values and principles of all Americans." Politicians have always and will always make great claims and comparisons and appeals to authority, history, etc., but I can't imagine a modern campaign (on either side) just flat our saying our guy is the best thing since Lincoln.

pyre 14y ago
Well, Bob Dole's campaign didn't have to deal with movies like "Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter" or "Abraham Lincoln vs. Zombies." Though maybe "Bob Dole: Liberal Slayer" would have been a better campaign platform? ;-)
Zimahl 14y ago
Considering in hindsight he was a great man who made the right decisions at the time, in his era Lincoln was such a polarizing figure.
brudgers 14y ago
I can't imagine a Republican of recent years running on this sort of environmental record: http://www.dolekemp96.org/agenda/issues/environment.htm http://www.dolekemp96.org/agenda/issues/environment.htm Then again, I increasingly have trouble imagining a Democrat doing so, either. I miss the World War II veterans in U.S. politics.
- scarmig 14y ago
  Or this: http://www.dolekemp96.org/agenda/issues/civil.htm http://www.dolekemp96.org/agenda/issues/civil.htm And today far too many people are salivating at the idea of gutting the Voting Rights Act. On the other hand, one of the longest pages is on the drug war (in support of extending and intensifying it). It's hard to imagine a Republican making that a central plank in their platform, either.

deleted 14y ago

[deleted]

marshray 14y ago

http://www.dolekemp96.org/news/releases/proct0796a.htm http://www.dolekemp96.org/news/releases/proct0796a.htm "DEBATE MENTION OF WEB SITE CAUSES FLOOD OF VISITORS -- Site Receives More Than 762,000 Hits in Single Four-Hour Period Today"

joaco 14y ago

I'm loving this language "Believe that? America can do better. Bob Dole. Jack Kemp. Cutting income taxes on every family 15%. A 500 dollar per child tax credit. Higher take home pay. Bob Dole. Cut taxes. Balance the budget. Raise take home pay. Tell the truth."

awwstn 14y ago

I wonder if they took online donations through the site. I see the donations link, but maybe it gave a phone number/address rather than a cc form.

cedricd 14y ago

What's interesting to me about these old sites is how bad the typography is. Why is it that sites started using decent typefaces only relatively recently? Print design was just as well understood back then.

tongtongbaby 14y ago

we are company, main products Wigs,False Eyelashes,Remy Hair Extensions,Indian Remy Hair Extensions,Stock Hair <a href="http://www.allbeautybox.com>http://www.allbeautybox.com</a&#62 http://www.allbeautybox.com>http://www.allbeautybox.com&...; Piece,Print Hair Extensions,Fashion Jewelry..... they are 100% original and brand new with cheap price. the our company have different kinds, there have males, females also girls needing, products are suit for different groups of people, maybe there is something you are just waiting for. To some people love jewelrys, sure this is the good news for you, our company because our company <a href="http://www.allbeautybox.com>Remy http://www.allbeautybox.com>Remy Hair Extensions</a> is a manufactures, so our company can be <a href="http://www.allbeautybox.com>lace http://www.allbeautybox.com>lace front wigs</a> sure you are the only one to be focus on the world, the most <a href="http://www.allbeautybox.com>False http://www.allbeautybox.com>False Eyelashes</a> important, these are the jewelrys and fashion and design. our company also have the Do you feeling amazing, then go and action, our company will take best services waiting for <a href="http://www.allbeautybox.com>Fashion http://www.allbeautybox.com>Fashion Jewelrys</a> you ! Important!!: our company accept safe payment, like Paypal.... do fast shipping , sure we protect our clients privacy, make order to our company, you get the safe business and privacy !!!!!