4 ms·
The actual app name would be good to have. Understandable they don’t want to throw them under the bus but it’s just delaying taking action by not revealing what
by loloquwowndueo 6mo ago
The actual app name would be good to have. Understandable they don’t want to throw them under the bus but it’s just delaying taking action by not revealing what app/service this was.
- progbits 6mo agoI was trying to look it up (basically https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/oauth2/javascript-implicit-flow#redirecting https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/oauth2/java... -- the consent screen shows the app name) but it now says "Error 401: invalid_client; The OAuth client was not found." so it was probably deleted by the oauth client owner.
- tom1337 6mo agoIt indeed was deleted as this URL shows: https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/v2/auth?client_id=110671459871-30f1spbu0hptbs60cb4vsmv79i7bbvqj.apps.googleusercontent.com&redirect_uri=urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob&response_type=code&scope=openid%20email%20profile https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/v2/auth?client_id=11067...
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- loloquwowndueo 6mo agoMakes it even more relevant to have the actual app or vendor name - who’s to say they just removed it to save face and won’t add it later?
- pottertheotter 6mo agoIt’s context.ai https://x.com/rauchg/status/2045995362499076169 https://x.com/rauchg/status/2045995362499076169
- tom1337 6mo ago[dead]