3 ms·
Extra? I thought they were clearly violating IP law to begin with. Unless I misunderstand this is "water is wet" territory (both the judgment as well as what An
by fc417fc802 7mo ago
Extra? I thought they were clearly violating IP law to begin with. Unless I misunderstand this is "water is wet" territory (both the judgment as well as what Anna's Archive did).
- mhitza 7mo agoExtra, because with the piracy of music they bought into equation members of (and implicitly) the recording industry https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recording_Industry_Association_of_America https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recording_Industry_Association...
- shevy-java 7mo agoI do not see any law being violated by Anna's Archive in the slightest.
- bulbar 7mo agoJust use it to train / tune a LLM. Apparently, everything becomes legal if you only put the stuff into the right kind of software. That's at least what many people like to argue here on HN.
- Cider9986 7mo agoAnna's wants[1] companies to train on their data. [1] https://annas-archive.gl/blog/ai-copyright.html https://annas-archive.gl/blog/ai-copyright.html
- bulbar 7mo agoThanks a lot, that's an interesting read and they make an interesting case. I would have thought all big AI companies used Anna's Archive, but apparently only some of the US based companies used them.
- gertop 7mo agoJust because you disagree with a law doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. You anti copyright shills are exhausting... Why can't you try to attract people to your side to eventually instead effect some real change? Do you just take that much pleasure in being an edgelord that your cause be damned?
- ndsipa_pomu 7mo agoWater isn't wet, but it does "wet" other things. Wetness is the degree to which a liquid contacts and adheres to a solid surface, so it's makes no sense to say that water is wet.