4 ms·
Define better. Fast fashion sucks, but hand-spun cotton won't give you Kevlar or modern wind-resistant clothing or fireproof materials for your furniture or...
by TeMPOraL 7mo ago
Define better. Fast fashion sucks, but hand-spun cotton won't give you Kevlar or modern wind-resistant clothing or fireproof materials for your furniture or... <insert half thousand different things adjacent to modern textile production>.
It's always win some, lose some with the economy, but technology itself opens previously impossible capabilities.
- TheOtherHobbes 7mo agoIt used to open them to most of the population - at least that was the ideal for a couple of decades - but now it seems to be opening them to oligarchs more than workers. It's essentially a political energy source. It heats everything up. Eventually it either explodes, goes through a phase change to a new (meta)stable state, or collapses back to a previous state.
- jimbokun 7mo agoWhat is the AI equivalent of wind-resistant clothing or fireproof materials? So far the only product AI is producing is layoffs.
- TeMPOraL 7mo ago> wind-resistant clothing Better autocomplete/autocorrect, "circle on screen" -> OCR anywhere, high-quality automated background removal[0]. > fireproof materials No big examples to point at now, except maybe whatever security fixes that'll come out of Glasswing Project[1]. > So far the only product AI is producing is layoffs. AI-related[2] layoffs are a direct consequence of useful things AI is delivering. -- [0] - Super useful for e.g. making ID photos, which I notice I need to do increasingly often, which is likely a consequence of proliferation of remote/digital ID verification, which nicely ties us back to question 'butlike expressed, i.e. how much is technological progress actually improving things. [1] - https://www.anthropic.com/glasswing https://www.anthropic.com/glasswing [2] - As opposed to "we wanted to lay off people anyway, AI just provided a socially-acceptable excuse".
- butlike 7mo agoBetter is 'longer lasting and less disposable.' Your comment got me thinking about if technology is actually better, but that's a whole new discussion. We wouldn't need the fireproof furniture if we all used the local sweat lodge for bathing or the mess hall yurt for cooking. We wouldn't need wind-resistant clothing if we didn't make personal rockets that go 200mph to travel long distances to arrive at the same amenities (just in a different city).
- TeMPOraL 7mo ago> Better is 'longer lasting and less disposable.' I'd generally agree, but there are always caveats. See e.g. glass vs. plastic bottles - glass looks like strictly superior solution environmentally, until you consider how much fuel is saved across entire logistics chain by plastic bottles being significantly lighter. > We wouldn't need wind-resistant clothing if we didn't make personal rockets that go 200mph to travel long distances to arrive at the same amenities (just in a different city) FWIW, I was thinking more about people who like to walk around in windy places, including mountains, etc. But even if we exclude tourists, we're still left with people who work at altitudes (including infrastructure anywhere - get on a high enough pole or roof, it's going to be windy). More generally, there are people doing useful work, including construction, services, and research, in all kinds of extreme environments, and this is directly enabled by post-industrial era fabrics.