3 ms·
Okay, I’m tired. Not quite inverse but per the title , must be a way.
by hyperhello 6mo ago
Okay, I’m tired. Not quite inverse but per the title , must be a way.
- freehorse 6mo agoI was mistaken above in the first identity, it is eml(1,eml(x,1)) = e - x Which then if you iterate gives x (ie is inverse of itself). eml(1,eml(eml(1,eml(x,1)),1)) = x