3 ms·
> So we should have let Iran have nukes? How many lives would have been lost then? Fewer, because we would've been deterred from attacking them. Unless we deci
by idle_zealot 7mo ago
> So we should have let Iran have nukes? How many lives would have been lost then?
Fewer, because we would've been deterred from attacking them. Unless we decided to risk nuclear war, I guess.
- annexrichmond 7mo agoUS doesn't have to engage for Iran to use nukes. But of course we should prevent that from becoming a realistic scenario?
- idle_zealot 7mo ago> US doesn't have to engage for Iran to use nukes Sure, in a purely physical sense, I suppose they could launch a nuke, triggering MAD and Israel's Samson Doctrine and ending human civilization for no reason. Currently I think Israel, the US, North Korea, and Russia have a higher (though still low) risk of doing that. In that order, by the way, though I could probably be convinced to bump Russia up higher.