3 ms·

I don't. that's why I am working with Wikipedia editors to help improve it. For example policies on aligning agents with wikipedia standards. This a topic that

by bryan0 6mo ago

I don't. that's why I am working with Wikipedia editors to help improve it. For example policies on aligning agents with wikipedia standards. This a topic that requires thought, not knee-jerk reactions.

th0ma5 6mo ago
[dead]
TRiG_Ireland 6mo ago
You clearly have no understanding of the principle of consent. If you don't want to destroy Wikipedia, why are you acting like this?
- russdill 6mo ago
  I'm suspect that many of his responses here are written by AI.
burnte 6mo ago
Their current policy of no AI bots is fine. No need to improve it, you can't.
- bryan0 6mo ago
  The current policy is not "no AI Bots": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_policy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_policy. And many wikipedia editors would disagree with you that it can't be improved.
  - sumeno 6mo ago
    > The use of LLMs to generate or rewrite article content is prohibited I'm not a wikipedia editor, but I assume this applies to bots as well https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Artificial_intelligence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Artificial_intellige...
  - burnte 6mo ago
    > And many wikipedia editors would disagree with you that it can't be improved. There are many people who think many things that are wrong. That doesn't make them right.
LetsGetTechnicl 6mo ago
How would using a bullshit generator trained on Wikipedia improve it in any way?