3 ms·
How can you think it's widespread when you restrict your analysis to top 0.1% outliers?
by azan_ 7mo ago
How can you think it's widespread when you restrict your analysis to top 0.1% outliers?
- swiftcoder 7mo agoBecause the rich are by definition a tiny group of outliers? Pretty much every FAANG engineer is in the top 5% of US by net worth. The ones who got lucky on an IPO are top 2% at worst, often top 1%.
- azan_ 7mo ago> Because the rich are by definition a tiny group of outliers? Not in the context of this discussion. Here both rich and poor have to be group large enough to actually introduce significant bias to the sauna study. Top 1% is unlikely to do that.