3 ms·

>What he proposes is radical It sounds entirely reasonable and moderate to me.

• senordevnyc 6mo ago
  It's neither reasonable nor moderate, which is why it'll never happen.
• throwaway27448 6mo ago
  Also entirely ineffective. Banning individual behavior won't prevent collective dysfunction and will only harm honest actors. The only answer that makes sense is reforming the acceptance of work to be resistant to the inevitable (ab)use of AI.
  • mrob 6mo ago
    It's the exact same anti-cheating method used to great effect in top level e-sports. You can't trust competitor-supplied hardware, so the only option is for the institution to ban it and supply all hardware itself. Higher education is primarily about competition between job candidates. Eliminating cheating needs to be top priority or the whole system will collapse.
    • throwaway27448 6mo ago
      > Eliminating cheating needs to be top priority or the whole system will collapse. It's going to collapse regardless because of the replication crisis. You might as well tackle the hard problem and figure out how to integrate replication into acceptance, or the consensus publication is intended to represent is meaningless. This is true regardless of whether a human or a robot is performing the work.