3 ms·

That's a non-sequitur to the question. And the answer is that women are equal to men in all things, except when things get serious, and then all of a sudden bi

That's a non-sequitur to the question. And the answer is that women are equal to men in all things, except when things get serious, and then all of a sudden biology matters again

itsyonas 7mo ago
> That's a non-sequitur to the question. How so? Why isn't the question 'Why is anyone being forced at all?' Their question assumes that someone has to be forced, which I fundamentally disagree with, so they should justify that assumption first. > And the answer is that women are equal to men in all things, except when things get serious, and then all of a sudden biology matters again Correct. They are equal, so I don't think either men or women should be forced.
mothballed 7mo ago
Well women are the rate limiting factor in having more men produced for war fodder. It probably makes more sense to ban birth control at the same time men are required to die for the war machine as both would then be playing out their slavery-induced biological role in ensuring survival of the nation. That is if you're down with the whole slavery for war thing.
- deleted 7mo ago
  [deleted]
- missedthecue 7mo ago
  Biologically true, but probably not in practice. Do we think Ukraine will compell women to repopulate postwar? It won't happen.
  - School-Cotton 7mo ago
    That’s essentially what the commenter is proposing when talking about banning birth control. This would be equivalent to compelling women to reproduce (or forego sexual relations, which in reality most people won’t do).
- Qem 7mo ago
  Wouldn't make more sense instead of make conscription mandatory only for men, to make it mandatory for all childless people then?
- samus 7mo ago
  Most actively wars are over long before the replacement rate starts to matter, and women that get pregnant or raise children will in all likelihood get an excemption from frontline duty.
stickfigure 7mo ago
> women are equal to men in all things, except in extreme circumstances when violence is required on a mass scale Fixed that for you.
- unsupp0rted 7mo ago
  Not only violence. There are plenty of concerning situations in which you all of a sudden stop putting middle-manager women in email jobs or HR/DEI finger-wagging jobs. When things get existential, the jobs favored by men multiply and the jobs favored by women decrease. And nowhere more than in countries and societies which are highly feminist and supportive of women, which seems counterintuitive but isn't.

That's a non-sequitur to the question. And the answer is that women are equal to men in all things, except when things get serious, and then all of a sudden biology matters again

itsyonas 7mo ago

> That's a non-sequitur to the question. How so? Why isn't the question 'Why is anyone being forced at all?' Their question assumes that someone has to be forced, which I fundamentally disagree with, so they should justify that assumption first. > And the answer is that women are equal to men in all things, except when things get serious, and then all of a sudden biology matters again Correct. They are equal, so I don't think either men or women should be forced.

mothballed 7mo ago

Well women are the rate limiting factor in having more men produced for war fodder. It probably makes more sense to ban birth control at the same time men are required to die for the war machine as both would then be playing out their slavery-induced biological role in ensuring survival of the nation. That is if you're down with the whole slavery for war thing.

deleted 7mo ago
[deleted]
missedthecue 7mo ago
Biologically true, but probably not in practice. Do we think Ukraine will compell women to repopulate postwar? It won't happen.
- School-Cotton 7mo ago
  That’s essentially what the commenter is proposing when talking about banning birth control. This would be equivalent to compelling women to reproduce (or forego sexual relations, which in reality most people won’t do).
Qem 7mo ago
Wouldn't make more sense instead of make conscription mandatory only for men, to make it mandatory for all childless people then?
samus 7mo ago
Most actively wars are over long before the replacement rate starts to matter, and women that get pregnant or raise children will in all likelihood get an excemption from frontline duty.

stickfigure 7mo ago

> women are equal to men in all things, except in extreme circumstances when violence is required on a mass scale Fixed that for you.

unsupp0rted 7mo ago
Not only violence. There are plenty of concerning situations in which you all of a sudden stop putting middle-manager women in email jobs or HR/DEI finger-wagging jobs. When things get existential, the jobs favored by men multiply and the jobs favored by women decrease. And nowhere more than in countries and societies which are highly feminist and supportive of women, which seems counterintuitive but isn't.