3 ms·
Not sure I understand your question, but the ESP32-S3[1] is the "CPU" here.
by peteforde 6mo ago
Not sure I understand your question, but the ESP32-S3[1] is the "CPU" here.
- forsakenharmony 6mo agoESP32-S31 (very different from the S3)
- peteforde 6mo agoThat's literally and exactly what I said.
- volemo 6mo agoTo be fair to GP, I too was confused by your use of brackets here.
- peteforde 6mo agoI wasn't trying to be obtuse. Formal grammar / technical documentation style guides consistently define: [ ... ] = optional { ... } = repetition | = alternatives
- IshKebab 6mo agoHacker news isn't a formal grammar specification though. People use [1] for references here too (which you could easily have forgotten).
- IshKebab 6mo agoThat's the SoC. The CPU is a small part of it. For example they could be using an open source design like the CVA6, or a commercial design from someone like Andes.
- peteforde 6mo agoEspressif has a designed-in-house RISC-V CPU, so far as I know.
- dvfjsdhgfv 6mo ago> Not sure I understand your question I'm not sure why you are not sure - S3 was using Cadence's Xtensa 32-bit LX7 dual-core microprocessor, but the article on S31 only mentions "dual core" without too much detail.