3 ms·

I would love to hear from people using both (Claude Code OR Codex) AND (Qwen) and their experience with Qwen models, are they on par, or how far are they?

• scottcha 6mo ago
  I switch between Claude Code (Opus/Sonnet) and Qwen (OpenCode, OpenClaw) multiple times throughout the day and Qwen 3.5 is really nice. I do also use KimiK2.5 and GLM5 pretty often too and I'm starting to get a sense that the agent tool is becoming a little more important than the model with these level of models. As long as tool calling and prompt quality is all configured correctly by the provider.
  • danelliot 6mo ago
    [dead]
  • edg5000 6mo ago
    What are the reasons for switching? Personally I got into the habit of doing a bit of a round robin with Codex/Claude (CLI) and then DeepSeek and Qwen web chat. And Claude in web chat. I like to switch just to learn the differences, otherwise I'd never know what the other models can do. But I still feel attached to Opus, but this can be fammillarity. If I only had Qwen maybe it would be effectively identical at the end of the day. Hard to say.
    • scottcha 6mo ago
      Mine are pretty unique since we optimize the energy for and run an inference service api so forces me to dogfood alot of different options.
• avib99 6mo ago
  [dead]
• fdsjgfklsfd 6mo ago
  Qwen3.5-plus is quite good, Qwen3.6-plus is not.