3 ms·
Is there a reason to think it was done by an LLM?
by FartyMcFarter 7mo ago
Is there a reason to think it was done by an LLM?
- rzmmm 7mo agoIt states "curation assisted by AI" at the bottom.
- FartyMcFarter 7mo agoThat doesn't mean the code in question was written by AI.
- Chaosvex 7mo agoThe author posted in this thread. It's AI.
- hxugufjfjf 7mo agoYou’re missing the point. It’s not a witch hunt, but rather a discussion on whether things are too quickly attributed to be AI generated.
- Chaosvex 7mo agoThat's one way to look at it but I don't think it was that deep.
- spiderfarmer 7mo agoThe biggest reason would be: do you know a single developer who could have produced this in a couple of hours?
- foolserrandboy 7mo agoYup, strange to see people still don’t understand LLMs massively speed up coding greenfield pet projects. Anytime you see a bee web app it’s better to assume AI use rather than not anymore.
- FartyMcFarter 7mo agoI'm not familiar enough with this animation library to answer that. Someone could be very used to this type of website and just copy paste things they've done before.
- spiderfarmer 7mo agoWhat does Occam's razor say?
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- marcellus23 7mo agoAI-generated UIs, at least ones aimed at an engineering audience, have a very distinct appearance. They seem to always have the following attributes: - Dark mode design with lots of colors - Buttons that have vibrant, bright borders and duller backgrounds - Excessive (IMO) usage of monospace fonts for stylistic reasons None of this proves that it's AI (the other comments have covered that) but in my experience it's always correct.