5 ms·
> If this happens and Cuba decides to launch drones/missiles against the US homeland, it's not an exaggeration to say that Cuba is flattened and invaded that sa
by misja111 6mo ago
> If this happens and Cuba decides to launch drones/missiles against the US homeland, it's not an exaggeration to say that Cuba is flattened and invaded that same afternoon.
Yes that would be a typical US solution. Let's liberate the Cuban people! By flattening them.
- randunel 6mo agoAmericans sure love their war crimes! Indiscriminately killing civilians is how they've gotten past, present and future terrorist attacks. I can't imagine the parents of the children they keep on killing (or maiming, or otherwise) standing by and watching. People wouldn't necessarily need to wait for their country's army to do something when they've got nothing significant left to lose.
- Joker_vD 6mo agoWhy, that's why you don't do genocide half-heartedly, you need to go all in, roll up your sleeves and really get down to work! Can't get a swarm of radicalized people if there is no people left to get radicalized.
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- data_maan 6mo agoTo be fair, Iran is not pretentious either, killing a few thousand people because they dared to protest. There are no good guys in this conflict.
- tovej 6mo agoWhat was the reason for those protests? Was it perhaps economic hardship brought about by US sanctions? How much is the US liable for the suffering of the Iranian people? (A lot, is the answer) That doesn't excuse the Iranian regime, but the US is not exactly helping, is it.
- bluGill 6mo agoIt was hardship brought on by not attempting to address the problems. Sanctions made things a bit worse but if Iran put effort into ensuring there was fresh water instead of funding terrorists and building missles things would have been a lot better for the people. (And likely no senctions for those things)
- tovej 6mo agoA bit worse? The sanctions directly brought about this. Scott Bessent admitted -- unprompted -- that the purpose of the sanctions was to destroy the Iranian economy. I'm not saying the regime is good. It's not. It's terrible. But that does not change what the US has done. The US has consistently made the suffering in Iran worse over the years. And let's not forget that the US and the British caused the Islamic revolutionaries to come into power by installing a puppet Shah that was deeply unpopular.
- imtringued 6mo agoI'm not sure that you can have the moral high ground in a hypothetical scenario where Cuba conspires with Iran to attack the US. At that point both parties are banking on "might makes right".
- cyclopeanutopia 6mo agoWell, in this hypothetical scenario you can just as well say that Cuba is defending from the future threat from USA, the same way USA is now defending from future threat from Iran.
- xbmcuser 6mo agoNot future threat though what US has put Cuba through the last 70 years any aggressive military from Cuba is probably justified. And no any attack from Cuba on US will still be morally ok if they attack US military and US banks etc.
- misja111 6mo agoI was replying to OP who sketched the scenario > Worst outcome is the US attacks Cuba .. As you probably know POTUS was announcing already that Cuba would be next.
- BLKNSLVR 6mo agoCuba's government is not the Cuban people, that's part of the whole point isn't it?
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- expedition32 6mo agoIf Cuba is attacked they are by international law allowed to strike military targets inside the US. The US isn't magically off limits.
- no_shadowban_6 6mo agoThe secret to understanding it all is that "liberate" really means "lynch"