3 ms·
In one study, GPT-4.5 was judged to be human 73% of the time, which means that the actual human was judged to be human only 27% of the time. More human than hum
by wat10000 7mo ago
In one study, GPT-4.5 was judged to be human 73% of the time, which means that the actual human was judged to be human only 27% of the time. More human than human, as Tyrell would say.
Edit: folks, the standard Turing test involves a computer and a human, and then a judge communicating with both and giving a verdict about which one is the human. The percentages for the two entities being judged will add up to exactly 100%. That's how this test was conducted. Please don't assume I'm a moron.
- dwpdwpdwpdwpdwp 7mo agoThe implication would be that GPT-4.5 was not judged to be human 27% of the time. You can't determine how often humans were judged correctly as humans from that data point.
- jmalicki 7mo agoThe structure of the test was that there was one human and one AI conversation partner, and the rater had to choose which one was which. Given that structure, you can judge from that data point.
- Melatonic 7mo agoThose stats dont necessarily line up that way. Do you have a link?
- jmalicki 7mo agoThat was also before the crazy AI hysteria we have today with the em-dash police everywhere.
- wat10000 7mo agoFor the test to be free of bias, we’ll have to ensure all the humans are from Nigeria.