3 ms·
Thanks for bringing up Nushell. I don't have working experience with Nushell. Just by looking at the documentation, I think the obvious differences are: 1. Nus
by perpetua 7mo ago
Thanks for bringing up Nushell.
I don't have working experience with Nushell.
Just by looking at the documentation, I think the obvious differences are:
1. Nushell is a simple shell script. Lambda is a full functional language. Nushell does not have class support.
2. Nushell does not have built-in markup data support.
3. Nushell does not have rich type, pattern matching and schema support.
4. Nushell is CLI. Lambda supports both CLI and GUI.
- ifh-hn 7mo agoNushell is a lot more than a simple shell script, it's a full programming language. Certainly no markup support builtin though. Unless I'm misunderstanding nushell has a type system and is strongly/gradually typed. And there is pattern matching too, though unsure what you mean by schema support?
- perpetua 7mo agothanks for pointing out. I did not notice that nushell has pattern matching. for schema support, I mean something like RelaxNG, or XML Schema.
- perpetua 7mo agoI agree that Nushell is close to a full programming language.
- perpetua 7mo agoLambda has first-class type support. Type can be constructed like data at runtime under Lambda, which is more powerful than most programming languages.