3 ms·

AI can both explore new things and exploit existing things. Nothing forces it to only rehash old stuff. >without actually making you like really happy or good.

AI can both explore new things and exploit existing things. Nothing forces it to only rehash old stuff. >without actually making you like really happy or good. What are you basing this off of. I've shared several AI songs with people in real life due to how much I've enjoyed them. I doing see why an AI playlist couldn't be good or make people happy. It just needs to find what you like in music. Again coming back to explore vs exploit.

qsera 8mo ago
>What are you basing this off of. Jokes. LLMs are not able to make me laugh all day by generating infinite stream of hilarious original jokes.. Does it work for you?
- charcircuit 8mo ago
  I've found several posts on moltbook funny. I don't really like regular jokes in general and I don't find human ones particularly funny either. I don't think we are at the point of being able to be reliable funny, but it definitely seems possible from my perspective.
  - qsera 8mo ago
    Care to link some?
    - charcircuit 8mo ago
      I think they would be hard to find due to how many posts exists along with how things aren't as funny the second time around.
      - qsera 8mo ago
        funny things are funny the n-th time around. Or may be it was just not funny and just something new for you..
        charcircuit 8mo ago
        We have different senses of humor.
        qsera 8mo ago
        Just tell one funny thing an LLM said...
        anthonyrstevens 8mo ago
        Yesterday it was "LLM's can't count R's in 'strawberry'." Today it's "LLM's can't tell jokes". Tomorrow it might be "LLM's can't do (X)", all while LLMs get better and better at every objection/challenge posed. The problem as I see it is that you have a fundamental objection to categorizing the way LLMs do their work as in any way related to "real gosh-darn human thinking". Which I think is wrong. At the root, we are just information-processing meat that happens to have had millions of years to optimize for speed, pattern recognition, feedback, etc.
        letmevoteplease 7mo ago
        Lots of examples here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46205632 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46205632

qsera 8mo ago

>What are you basing this off of. Jokes. LLMs are not able to make me laugh all day by generating infinite stream of hilarious original jokes.. Does it work for you?

charcircuit 8mo ago
I've found several posts on moltbook funny. I don't really like regular jokes in general and I don't find human ones particularly funny either. I don't think we are at the point of being able to be reliable funny, but it definitely seems possible from my perspective.
- qsera 8mo ago
  Care to link some?
  - charcircuit 8mo ago
    I think they would be hard to find due to how many posts exists along with how things aren't as funny the second time around.
    - qsera 8mo ago
      funny things are funny the n-th time around. Or may be it was just not funny and just something new for you..
      - charcircuit 8mo ago
        We have different senses of humor.
        qsera 8mo ago
        Just tell one funny thing an LLM said...
        anthonyrstevens 8mo ago
        Yesterday it was "LLM's can't count R's in 'strawberry'." Today it's "LLM's can't tell jokes". Tomorrow it might be "LLM's can't do (X)", all while LLMs get better and better at every objection/challenge posed. The problem as I see it is that you have a fundamental objection to categorizing the way LLMs do their work as in any way related to "real gosh-darn human thinking". Which I think is wrong. At the root, we are just information-processing meat that happens to have had millions of years to optimize for speed, pattern recognition, feedback, etc.
        letmevoteplease 7mo ago
        Lots of examples here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46205632 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46205632