3 ms·
This was before Actions and a whole lot of other non-git related stuff. There was years (maybe even a decade?) where GitHub essentially was unchanged besides fi
by embedding-shape 8mo ago
This was before Actions and a whole lot of other non-git related stuff. There was years (maybe even a decade?) where GitHub essentially was unchanged besides fixes and small incremental improvements, long time ago :)
- wongarsu 8mo agoGH Actions was good for them as another billable feature, but I'm skeptical we actually gained much over external CI providers The improvements to PR review have been nice though
- cozzyd 8mo agoDon't forget the security implications if you host your own actions runner.
- nine_k 8mo agoWhat are these?
- embedding-shape 8mo ago> The improvements to PR review have been nice though I dunno, probably the worst UX downgrade so far, almost no PRs are "fully available" on page load, but requires additional clicks and scrolling to "unlock" all the context, kind of sucks. Used to be you loaded the PR diff and you actually saw the full diff, except really large files. You could do CTRL+F and search for stuff, you didn't need to click to expand even small files. Reviewing medium/large PRs is just borderline obnoxious today on GH.
- epistasis 8mo agoI find it impossible to use the current diff view for most codebases, and spend tons of time clicking open all available sections... They have somehow found the worst possible amount of context for doing review. I tend to pull everything down to VS Code if I want to have any confidence these days.
- jmaw 8mo agoBack in the day when software could be "finished". Ahh, the good 'ol days