4 ms·
The S3 API/UX/cost model is so seductively simple for static hosting though. I kind of think they deserve their ubiquity. Not on 90% of their products though.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
The S3 API/UX/cost model is so seductively simple for static hosting though. I kind of think they deserve their ubiquity. Not on 90% of their products though.
- PaulHoule 7mo agoIt's great for some applications, like to serve up the QR codes for this system https://mastodon.social/@UP8/116086491667959840 https://mastodon.social/@UP8/116086491667959840 I could even make those cards tradeable like NFTs, use DynamoDB as the ledger, and not worry about the cost at all. On the other hand if you are talking about something bandwidth heavy forget about AWS. Video hosting with Cloudfront doesn't seem that difficult, even developing a YouTube clone where anybody could upload a video and it gets hosted seems like a moderate sized project. But with the bandwidth meter always running that kind of system could put you into the poorhouse pretty quickly if it caught on. Much of why YouTube doesn't have competition is exactly that: Google's costs are very low and they have an established system of monetization. I am keeping my photo albums on Behance rather than self-hosting because I lost enough money on a big photo site in AWS that it drove my wife furious and it took me a few years to pay off the debt.
- groundzeros2015 7mo ago> I lost enough money on a big photo site in AWS I’m sorry what. This is supposed to persuade me?