3 ms·
Asking back, when I limit the outgoing connections from a network, why would I account for any nonstandard port and make the ruleset unwieldy, just in case some
by 9dev 7mo ago
Asking back, when I limit the outgoing connections from a network, why would I account for any nonstandard port and make the ruleset unwieldy, just in case someone wanted to do something clever?
- Dylan16807 7mo agoA simple ruleset would only block a couple dangerous ports and leave everything else connectable. Whitelisting outgoing destination ports is more complicated and more annoying to deal with for no benefit. The only place you should be whitelisting destination ports is when you're looking at incoming connections.
- 9dev 7mo agoI definitely block outgoing ports on all our servers by default; Established connections, HTTP(S), DNS, NTP, plus infra-specific rules. There is really no legitimate reason to connect to anything else. The benefit is defence against exfiltration.
- Dylan16807 7mo agoIf you're allowing direct https out, how are you stopping exfiltration? Maybe https is routed through a monitoring proxy, but in the situation of allowing ssh the ssh wouldn't be going though one. So I still don't see the point of restricting outgoing ports on a machine that's allowed to ssh out.
- 9dev 7mo agoYou can't, reasonably. It's just a heuristic against many exploits using non-standard ports to avoid detection by proxies or traffic inspection utilities.
- otterley 7mo agoYou can, but you need additional components to do it, like an SSH session broker (i.e. a gateway or proxy). Some of these, like SSH Communications' PrivX suite, can record all traffic running through the proxy. It's not all that different from HTTPS security and auditing proxies.