4 ms·
I think a simpler argument would be that small web is not a good fit if your content is sensitive in the place you are publishing from. It’s meant for public p
by jimbokun 8mo ago
I think a simpler argument would be that small web is not a good fit if your content is sensitive in the place you are publishing from. It’s meant for public publishing. If you need encryption, use a different distribution mechanism.
- UqWBcuFx6NV4r 8mo agoThat is not the only protection that HTTPS offers. US ISPs used to inject ads into HTML HTTP responses. Can all this performative love for unencrypted HTTP just die already. You’ve all forgotten what it was actually like, and what the drawbacks actually are. This is so tiring.
- gzread 8mo agoThe act of reading can also be sensitive.