5 ms·
Building a Reader for the Smallest Hard Drive
- tda 7mo agoIs there a video somewhere of the one inch microdrive with acrylic display shown in the article?
- voctor 7mo agohttps://x.com/will_whang/status/2014960768249372845 https://x.com/will_whang/status/2014960768249372845
- Tempest1981 7mo agoCool! I found the old drive that worked with my Canon camera. It's a Hitachi 2GB Microdrive from 2003. It says CF+ Type-II. So larger, with a CompactFlash interface, boring in comparison. More history: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microdrive https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microdrive I'm trying to remember the camera... Canon Powershot S1 IS maybe? It used a lot more battery running the microdrive.
- jusssi 7mo agoDamn, now I want one just to de-lid one and put it on a shelf. Looks like eBay has plenty of these.
- Tempest1981 7mo agoTempting. I wonder what material they used for the platter. I once took apart a 1.8" drive, and got a big surprise when the platter suddenly shattered. I was expecting aluminum, not glass/ceramic substrate.
- adrian_b 7mo agoYes, glass was the typical substrate used in small HDDs, even in many of the 2.5" HDDs, e.g. in all the 2.5" HDDs that I had. It is easier to ensure that glass substrates are perfectly plane and without any surface defects than for substrates made of aluminum alloy. In 3.5" disks the risk of shattering becomes too great, so aluminum alloy is preferred.
- alnwlsn 7mo agoI discovered that one day when I accidentally stepped on a removed 2.5" platter in bare feet :)
- raddan 7mo agoOne of my most delightful discoveries of the early 2000s was that iPod Minis used Microdrives that were pin-compatible with CompactFlash cards. I had a little cottage industry in the back of my office upgrading my coworkers’ old iPods to use bigger, solid state disks. I still have my 256GB iPod Mini. Aside from battery life, it still runs fine, and it is by far my favorite music player form factor.
- blooalien 7mo ago> ... "and it is by far my favorite music player form factor." I really liked the old original iPod Nano myself. Had one for years that I was triple-booting RockBox (for extended media formats support and fancier interface), iPodLinux (for playing Doom and other toys), and the original iPod OS (just in case). Still haven't yet owned another device in that size / form factor that can do as much as that little thing did. Apple really did make some sweet devices back in the day... :)
- wartywhoa23 7mo agoLost me at the first OpenClaw mention.
- Tempest1981 7mo agoSurprised me too. In the end, I guess it's a time-saving tool for a tedious task. But reduces the old-school grittiness of the adventure. Still an enjoyable read.
- jgrahamc 7mo agoWhy? It seems foolish to have a knee jerk reaction to someone using a tool that got them where they needed to be.
- iovrthoughtthis 7mo agoI suppose its a bit like winning a first person shooter game with aim assist on It is not an authentic display of pure skill
- raddan 7mo agoThat’s a good question, and I can’t speak for the parent, but for me, I like reading about a person’s journey of discovery. There were many insights this person did not have because he turned the task over to a power tool. People can use whatever tools they want. I also can spend my attention however I like. Reading about someone using AI is just boring to me.
- wartywhoa23 7mo agoAlmost every commenter in this thread explained this better than I could. It's a bit like watching a 2 hour movie about a knight who'd been preparing to save his beloved princess from a dragon for 1h 59s, and then the screen fades to black, the narrator proclaims that the dragon is done, the knight marries the princess and they live happily ever after. Closing credits!
- fancyfredbot 7mo agoI was not evicting expecting to see OpenClaw here either. It's out of keeping with the rest of the article... At least there's acknowledgement of limitations and it's not just hype. Overall a useful data point in terms of what's possible.
- alias_neo 7mo agoI remember my Nokia N91 which had a 4GB version of one of these tiny HDDs, blew my mind at the time. Man do I miss the N-series, I had so many good phones in that era.
- andai 7mo agoFirst time hearing about this. I just looked up that drive. That's genuinely amazing, and kind of adorable.
- tarasglek 7mo agoWorked on that phone. I diagnosed if music player cache was working by putting back of phone to my ear and listening for seeking clicks from hdd
- alias_neo 7mo agoNice! I loved that phone, was one of my favourites. One of the only, if not the only phone I ever owned that had a metal shell that I an recall. I had most of the N range, and was particularly interested in music ones, N95 was love/hate because the music button/reverse slide was so slow sometimes, and generally it just wasn't as good as N91 for music listening with its proper headphone jack placement, and always accessible controls. What kind of magic did that HDD have that it could be thrown around like a phone typically is without the issues we would see if we'd handled a laptop with HDD the same way?
- tarasglek 7mo agoHad an accelerometer that turned off hard drive when motion detected. High end ibm thinkpads had that too. Turns out if seek head is parked properly, its fairly robust N91 also had a ridiculously high quality DAC that beat pants off iPods of that gen.
- alias_neo 6mo agoI think I remember reading something about that at the time, the accelerometer thing, maybe it was in the manual. Sounds quality was great and I loved the dock too.
- thehamkercat 7mo ago"Coded by OpenClaw" written on PCB was this necessary? could've said "Code written by LLM" or something
- mkirsten 7mo agoStill a great story, great page and impressive reverse engineering. Isn't OpenClaw vs. he did it "himself" a bit analogue to the critique "oh, he wrote the firmware in C++ and let the compiler figure out the assembly code". Maybe you wanted to see the assembly code, and that's fine. But he took a potentially difficult problem, found tools to solve it and documented (to some degree) the process?
- zimpenfish 7mo agoPretty sure I've got one of these in a 4GB USB package[0]. [0] I'm 99.9% sure it's not SSD/SRAM/Flash because I'm 99.9% sure it predates cheap [those] by years. But I'll have to dig it out and get the full USB/HDD info later to check.