4 ms·
People have predicted the end of the world for literally thousands of years. Should’ve happened by now, right?
by designerarvid 7mo ago
People have predicted the end of the world for literally thousands of years. Should’ve happened by now, right?
- raincole 7mo agoThis has names too btw: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum
- amelius 7mo agoAnd what do you call it when someone flings the names of fallacies at their opponent without argumentation? (I agree with you, though)
- lucianbr 7mo agoThere's a first time for everything, and an end to most things. The roman empire lasted hundreds of years, and then it ended. Many empires did. The sun will end too, at some point. Ice ages last for thousands of years, then they end. And there are countless other examples. "X has lasted a long time so it will last more" is so obviously wrong. Think about it for more than 3 seconds. Or was it sarcasm? I can't tell anymore.
- chrisoverzero 7mo ago> “X has lasted a long time so it will last more” is so obviously wrong. Smarter people than you and I have thought about this problem and come to the opposite conclusion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lindy_effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lindy_effect
- lucianbr 7mo ago> is a theorized phenomenon I wonder why they put that "theorized" word in there. It would be so much easier to say "it is a phenomenon". Only that sentence would not be true now would it? Come on. The wiki article just connects a name to an explanation, does not prove or even claim the effect is real.