4 ms·
That’s not what they paid for, they paid to speak to person x, not person y.
by PUSH_AX 7mo ago
That’s not what they paid for, they paid to speak to person x, not person y.
- boxedemp 7mo agoThey paid to interact with a computer, and they did. On the Internet nobody knows I'm a dog, and that's ok.
- PUSH_AX 7mo agoThis is not what is advertised, and if it was there would be no money in it.
- boxedemp 7mo agoI've been alive for several decades and almost nothing I've gotten was exactly as advertised. I'm not saying that's good, but it's consistent with reality.
- TurdF3rguson 7mo agoConsistent with what you think of as reality. For all you know, you're being Truman Show'ed.
- cindyllm 7mo ago[dead]
- ErroneousBosh 7mo agoWhich makes me wonder why Person Y doesn't just spin up their own account, since they've already got warm leads.
- dragonwriter 7mo agoBecause what Person Y is doing is no more the whole of the job than what Person X is doing, and OF can more easily detect (though its still far from perfect, I've heard) and aggressively cracks down on when the person doing Person X's job is not the person who legally owns the account.