Not "service" in human speech. Service, in bullshit legalese. They define their software as > along with any associated apps, software, and websites (together,

Not "service" in human speech. Service, in bullshit legalese. They define their software as > along with any associated apps, software, and websites (together, our “Services”) As far as I understand, these terms actually hold up in court, too. Which is complete fucking nonsense that, I think, could only be the result of a technologically illiterate class making the decisions. Being penalised for trying to understand what software is doing on your machine is so wholly unreasonable that it should not be a valid contractual term.