4 ms·
> To decompile, reverse engineer, disassemble, or otherwise reduce our Services to human-readable form, except when these restrictions are prohibited by applica
by embedding-shape 8mo ago
> To decompile, reverse engineer, disassemble, or otherwise reduce our Services to human-readable form, except when these restrictions are prohibited by applicable law.
Luckily, it doesn't seem like any service was reverse-engineered or decompiled here, only a software that lived on the authors disk.
- onion2k 8mo agoAgain, read the terms. Service has a specific meaning, and it isn't what you're assuming. Don't assume things about legal docs. You will often be wrong. Get a lawyer if it's something important.
- embedding-shape 8mo agoThanks for the additional context, I'm not a user of CC anymore, and don't read legal documents for fun. Seems I made the right choice in the first place :)
- applfanboysbgon 8mo agoNot "service" in human speech. Service, in bullshit legalese. They define their software as > along with any associated apps, software, and websites (together, our “Services”) As far as I understand, these terms actually hold up in court, too. Which is complete fucking nonsense that, I think, could only be the result of a technologically illiterate class making the decisions. Being penalised for trying to understand what software is doing on your machine is so wholly unreasonable that it should not be a valid contractual term.
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- doc_ick 8mo agoSee John Deere in the US, or Apple, or other fun companies. I fully agree it’s nonsense, but it’s commonplace.
- doc_ick 8mo ago“ I dug into the Claude Code binary.”