3 ms·
If you're forbidding people from doing things they could do yesterday, it's best to be a little conservative with your scope. 16-yo kids might do some amount o
by pdpi 7mo ago
If you're forbidding people from doing things they could do yesterday, it's best to be a little conservative with your scope.
16-yo kids might do some amount of part time work, and should at least have enough of a concept of money to understand why pressing the "more loot boxes" button is a Bad Idea. They're also old enough that they might potentially have their own bank account and their own card, which then caps the damages to their allowance.
- charcircuit 7mo agoThat would require extra work to pass more legislation which has a chance to fail. I think it's better to do it all once instead of having to revisit the issue every couple years.
- tjpnz 7mo agoSo what's the issue then? The minimum is 16 - or are you proposing kids 15 and younger have the right to gamble?
- kulahan 7mo agoIt’s not like if it fails, you’re forbidden from trying again, yeah? Or am I incorrect on this? Not European.