3 ms·
This is what I've been trying to get nanobot to do, so thanks for sharing this. I plan to use this for workflow definitions like filesystems. I have a known wo
by Multicomp 7mo ago
This is what I've been trying to get nanobot to do, so thanks for sharing this. I plan to use this for workflow definitions like filesystems.
I have a known workflow to create an RPG character with steps, lets automate some of the boilerplate by having a succession of LLMs read my preferences about each step and apply their particular pieces of data to that step of the workflow, outputting their result to successive subdirectories, so I can pub/sub the entire process and make edits to intermediate files to tweak results as I desire.
Now that's cool!
- jrswab 7mo agoLove to hear it! Thanks for checking it out and feel free to put up an issue on GitHub if you have any ideas for improvements.
- avoutic 7mo agoWhere is the nanobot approach not working for you?
- Multicomp 7mo agoFor me its mostly that nanobot is very not stable, its only 0.1.4.post4 and who knows what software provenance it's got. Functionality that worked last week doesn't work this week (anecdote: I used to be able to do long tool chains and conversations back to back but after more recent updates, the tool seems to only do one tool write then report back that it's done more tool writings and I have to remind it to finish the job).