4 ms·
> A third of them were made redundant If I'm reading this correctly, the interpretation should be that a third of them were transferred to new branches. 0.66
by Cpoll 7mo ago
> A third of them were made redundant
If I'm reading this correctly, the interpretation should be that a third of them were transferred to new branches.
0.66 (two thirds retention) * 1.4 (40% more branches) = 0.84, so we only expect ~16% were made redundant.
- Dylan16807 7mo ago.66 * 1.4 = .92, so it's even less.
- Cpoll 7mo agoWhoops, not sure how I made that mistake. Thanks for the correction.