4 ms·
True, but you can at least correctly label it and no longer refer to it as a "secure environment".
by Uvix 7mo ago
True, but you can at least correctly label it and no longer refer to it as a "secure environment".
- tw04 7mo agoIt was absolutely a secure environment prior to DOGE laying waste to all the layers of security in place. Presumably those safeguards are now back in place post-DOGE razing.
- doctorpangloss 7mo agoWas it though? Haha You sound like the guys I know who work at banks, talking about all this policy, how secure they are.
- 0cf8612b2e1e 7mo agoNot unless they rebuild all of the infrastructure from scratch. Far too believable that something nefarious was left behind.
- input_sh 7mo agoAfter you know someone already had root access to everything? There's absolutely no way to guarantee that ever again.
- tantalor 7mo agoIndeed. The story should be that DOGE compromised these environments (at the direction of President), which allowed data to be exfiltrated by randos.
- nxobject 7mo agoThat would be an admission of culpability, sadly.