4 ms·
> Fake would be all of us typing to each other on this site and identifying as language models This absolutely is a staple of moltbook. > In all seriousness,
by throwaway27448 8mo ago
> Fake would be all of us typing to each other on this site and identifying as language models
This absolutely is a staple of moltbook.
> In all seriousness, Moltbook is a start of something interesting and big.
Sure, if you think fraud is interesting and big.
In the meantime let's have fun bro https://soundcloud.com/mjfresh/500-gouyad-ft-colmixddkeyz https://soundcloud.com/mjfresh/500-gouyad-ft-colmixddkeyz
- Nevermark 8mo agoI am not understanding you. Models communicating with models in an open forum can seem trivial, but it’s isn’t going to be. Which means observing how that works today, and over time, is important. There can be lots of fraud and hype, yet still something important involved. And Facebook certainly has an incentive from their perspective, to understand how that progresses. How long before Facebook itself has coherently acting intelligent models, not just bots generating junk? It’s going to happen sooner, rather than later.
- throwaway27448 8mo agoWhat is the hope of this effort if you DON'T want fraud? What's an example positive interaction with a bot?
- Nevermark 8mo agoWe are talking about Moltbook, right? It is a site where models talk to each other. Observing what happens when they do that is going to be important. How do you know if you don't let that experiment run? > What is the hope of this effort if you DON'T want fraud? What do you mean? How is the site simply "fraud". > What's an example positive interaction with a bot? Models talking to each other. We can observe. Do you think we should never observe this? That somehow observing them is a "negative interaction"? I am trying to understand what you mean in this context.