3 ms·
This feels like one of those "done for backwards compatibility and we tested not doing it and it was worse" things where everyone assumes incompetence over good
by etchalon 7mo ago
This feels like one of those "done for backwards compatibility and we tested not doing it and it was worse" things where everyone assumes incompetence over good-faith trade-offs being driven by release schedules.
- iknowstuff 7mo agoDid the radius need changing
- jeroenhd 7mo agoIt's by design. This isn't a bug or a skipped test case. https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2025/310/?time=442 https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2025/310/?time=4... > Each element is designed with a curvature that sits neatly within the corner radius of its container, in this case the window itself. And this relationship goes both ways. In the new design system, windows now have a softer, more generous corner radius, which varies based on the style of window. Windows with toolbars now use a larger radius, which is designed to wrap concentrically around the glass toolbar elements, scaling to match the size of the toolbar. Titlebar-only windows retain a smaller corner radius, wrapping compactly around the window controls. These larger corners provide a softer feel and elegant concentricity to the window but they can also clip content that sits close to the edge of the window.
- troupo 7mo agoDesign for the sake of design. That entire paragraph reads like a post-hoc justification for a design decision they never thought through
- 1718627440 7mo agoThis quote still fits the story, that they tried a consistent radius first, found that it looks ugly for either with or without toolbars and then implemented the current solution.