4 ms·
> If you ask to unify the duplication, it'll say "No problem, here's a brand new metamock abstract adapter framework that has a superset of all feature sets, pl
by stingraycharles 8mo ago
> If you ask to unify the duplication, it'll say "No problem, here's a brand new metamock abstract adapter framework that has a superset of all feature sets, plus two new metamock drivers for the older and the newer code! Let me know if you want me to write tests for the new adapters."
Nevermind the fact that it only migrated 3 out of 5 duplicated sections, and hasn’t deleted any now-dead code.
- Mavvie 8mo agoSounds like my coworkers.
- Foobar8568 8mo agoThat's the reality nobody really wants to say.
- Jweb_Guru 8mo agoIt's not reality. I'm really not a fan of the way that people excuse the really terrible code LLMs write by claiming that people write code just as bad. Even if that were true, it is not true that when you ask those people to do otherwise they simply pretend to have done it and forget you asked later.
- evolve-maz 8mo ago[dead]
- imiric 8mo agoIt's an easy copout. Tool works as expected? It's superintelligence. Programming is dead. Tool makes dumb mistake? So do humans.
- brabel 8mo agoYes and both are right. It’s a matter of which is working as expected and making fewer mistakes more often. And as someone using Claude Code heavily now, I would say we’re already at a point where AI wins.
- ttoinou 8mo agoNo but they will despise you for bringing the problem up
- Jweb_Guru 8mo agoIn the long run, good code makes everyone much happier than code that is bad because people are being "nice" and letting things slide in code review to avoid confrontation.
- darkwater 8mo ago> it is not true that when you ask those people to do otherwise they simply pretend to have done it and forget you asked later. I had a coworker that more or less exactly did that. You left a comment in a ticket about something extra to be done, he answered "yes sure" and after a few days proceeded to close the ticket without doing the thing you asked. Depending on the quantity of work you had at the moment, you might not notice that until after a few months, when the missing thing would bite you back in bitter revenge.
- Jweb_Guru 8mo agoYou may have had one. It clearly made a pretty negative impression on you because you are still complaining about them years later. I find it pretty misanthropic when people ascribe this kind of antisocial behavior to all of their coworkers.
- darkwater 8mo agoIt's still relatively recent. Anyway I'm not saying everyone is like this, absolutely (not even an important chunk), but they do exist. At the same time it's not true that current LLMs only write terrible code.
- lukan 8mo ago"Even if that were true, it is not true that when you ask those people to do otherwise they simply pretend to have done it and forget you asked later." I admire your experience with people.
- dns_snek 8mo agoThe point is, that's not the typical experience and people like that can be replaced. We don't willingly bring people like that on our teams, and we certainly don't aim to replace entire teams with clones of this terrible coworker prototype.
- queenkjuul 8mo agoNot only have i never had a coworker as bad as these people describe, the point is as you say: why would I want an LLM that works like these people's shitty coworkers? My worst coworkers right now are the ones using Claude to write every word of code and don't test it. These are people who never produced such bad code on their own. So the LLMs aren't just as bad as the bad coworkers, they're turning good coworkers into bad ones!
- lukan 8mo agoCouple of reasons, but mainly speed and avaiability. I can give Claude a job anytime and it will do it immediately. And yes, I will have to double check anything important, but I am way better and faster at checking, than doing it myself. So obviously I don't want a shitty LLM as coworker, but a competent one. But the progress they made is pretty astonishing and they are good enough now that I started really integrating them.
- cindyllm 8mo ago[dead]
- duskdozer 8mo agoMaybe, but it lets them pump out much, much more code than they otherwise would have been able to. That's the "100x" in their AI productivity multipliers.
- queenkjuul 8mo agoSounds like you just work at a shitty company
- lelanthran 8mo agoMaybe, but I'd bet a large sum of money that each of your coworkers aren't turning out this drivel at a rate of 3kLoC per hour. Can you imagine working with someone who produces 100k lines of unmaintainable code in a single sprint? This is your future.
- GeoAtreides 8mo agopeople also piss in rivers, yet dumping raw sewage by million m^3 in the same rivers is generally (less so in uk) frowned upon...
- 0x008 8mo agoThe problem is that you are looking at the code. /s