4 ms·
I don’t believe this is true. There are plenty of roles that are happy to hire remotely. Sure, there is an in person requirement for many job listings but Ive f
by pm90 7mo ago
I don’t believe this is true. There are plenty of roles that are happy to hire remotely. Sure, there is an in person requirement for many job listings but Ive found EMs/companies to be very flexible if they need to hire talent.
For people that can’t/dont want to move to the “hubs”, just know that there is absolutely still a career path. I will say though that you need to have above average communication skills and proactively build relationships during in person off-sites.
- alephnerd 7mo agoThere absolutely are remote first roles in the US, but the competition is also extremely intense. The median SWE and HNer wouldn't make the cut. It also requires a level of maturity, clear thinking, self-starterness, and independence that is hard to come by without a proven track record and experience. My advice is for the median/average SWE and HNer, not for the truly exceptional. Spending a 7-10 years in a hub and then going remote first is the best path because you build the network you need to get referrals to vouch for you as a remote-first hire well as the track record needed to go remote-first.
- pm90 7mo ago7-10 years is too much. 2-4 is around the range I would give. Its also nothing new; new grads gravitated towards these hubs anyway. Previously, they would settle down in the burbs. Now they're migrating anywhere in the US.
- alephnerd 7mo ago2-4 is too little - not enough time to show value nor build an entrenched network that can refer you long term.
- bobanrocky 7mo agoNope, the number of remote roles are drastically reducing. If your are a sw dev/mgr, you’ll need to be at least hybrid to your company’s ‘tech center’