4 ms·
But the author of that page is not concerned with readability or accessibility. He just wants things to look cool and design-y. One piece of supporting evidence
by chihuahua 8mo ago
But the author of that page is not concerned with readability or accessibility. He just wants things to look cool and design-y. One piece of supporting evidence he cites is some random photo he took that doesn't contain #000000 black. That doesn't mean anything, it could be that it's over-exposed, or has poor contrast, or had some silly filter applied. This leads me to think that the author of that page doesn't know what he's talking about.
- russelldjimmy 8mo agoAdditions without any evidence: > He just wants things to look cool and design-y > some random photo > That doesn't mean anything This leads me to believe the author of this post doesn’t know what they’re talking about
- 112233 8mo agoSo you routinely encounter photographs that have noticable areas where sensor did not receive any light during exposure? To the point where you feel not having completely unlit parts of a photo is a sign of over-exposure or filters? Are you an astrophotographer?