4 ms·
I'm happy for the existence of the e line mainly because it forces them to bump up the specs on the base iPhone. 17 is so good now that there's very little reas
by paxys 8mo ago
I'm happy for the existence of the e line mainly because it forces them to bump up the specs on the base iPhone. 17 is so good now that there's very little reason to get the 17 Pro.
- alwillis 8mo agoYes, the baseline 17 has almost all of the features of previous Pro models.
- alok-g 8mo agoGenuinely asking -- How about the camera? I keep hearing that camera is much better on 17 pro than 17 base. The OP article keeps saying camera on 17e is 'stunning', but again, I am waiting to find out how it compares with 17 pro.
- wongogue 8mo agoAt the moment, the camera is almost the main point of getting the Pro. And battery for the Pro Max.
- indemnity 8mo agoI had an Air with the same camera system as the 17e, I believe. Coming from a 15 Pro Max, it was perfectly serviceable if you were happy with the limited zoom options and lack of wide angle shots. I never realized how much I used those two features, so, regrettably had to go back to the chunky 17 Pro Max. Maybe one day…
- dzhiurgis 8mo agoWide angle is rarely used by me except it’s pretty good macro capabilities. It is better than your eyes.
- KeplerBoy 8mo agoBeing better than eyes at macro vision is not hard.
- dzhiurgis 8mo agoYou recon? Only last few years it finally became useable.
- wao0uuno 8mo agoI don't think I ever used the ultra wide camera in my phone. I find the default wide angle already too wide for most use cases. For some reason every phone includes one but not a ~50mm equivalent. Weird.