4 ms·

American people: latinamerican here. Maybe it's silly to root for a country in the world hegemony arena. I've usually been partial to the USA over China. Now I'

by hoppoli 7mo ago

American people: latinamerican here. Maybe it's silly to root for a country in the world hegemony arena. I've usually been partial to the USA over China. Now I'm not rooting for your country anymore. As far as I'm concerned, I'd rather have China being the foremost power, at least they seem to be less keen on invading or heavily strong-arming latinamerica

throw9x9 7mo ago
and USA created Islamic terrorism that is plaguing the whole world
- spaghetdefects 7mo ago
  Surely you mean Zionist terrorism.
  - underlipton 7mo ago
    Both tbh. Unless you say that one is Britain's fault.
pinkmuffinere 7mo ago
I empathize, but surely China is not the right choice? Can we please have like, Australia? Or a unified EU?
kittikitti 7mo ago
American here, I would much rather have China being the foremost power too. This saga with Anthropic shows just how clueless these AI companies are. This soap opera has to stop, none of these CEO's, officials from the Trump administration, or the Department of War are good for humanity. I've read the ethics policies that China that they released on generative AI and it's years ahead of anything we have in America. China's AI Safety Governance Framework: https://www.cac.gov.cn/2025-09/15/c_1759653448369123.htm https://www.cac.gov.cn/2025-09/15/c_1759653448369123.htm Most Americans hate AI and it's effectively the ostrich effect where they hope to outright ban it and ignore everything else. Meanwhile, all the evil people are running the show. While Anthropic continues to propagate Sinophobic messaging, DeepSeek and other companies have a much more muted tone.
- base76 7mo ago
  The cynicism is earned. But "nobody is good for humanity" is where analysis stops. What's actually happening is a jurisdictional split forming in real time. The US is pricing out companies that won't remove human oversight from weapons systems. That's not a soap opera — it's a policy signal with long-term consequences for where frontier AI development lands geographically. Europe isn't perfect. But it's the only major jurisdiction actively building the governance infrastructure to keep humans in the loop by law, not by goodwill. That matters when goodwill runs out — which, as you note, it tends to do. The people building that alternative aren't the CEOs in Washington. Worth knowing they exist.
poszlem 7mo ago
They are literally doing what China has already done. In what world would China be a better option here?
- GeorgeWBasic 7mo ago
  In this world, the one where China isn't invading its neighbors and overthrowing governments all around the world.

by hoppoli 7mo ago

throw9x9 7mo ago

and USA created Islamic terrorism that is plaguing the whole world

spaghetdefects 7mo ago
Surely you mean Zionist terrorism.
- underlipton 7mo ago
  Both tbh. Unless you say that one is Britain's fault.

pinkmuffinere 7mo ago

I empathize, but surely China is not the right choice? Can we please have like, Australia? Or a unified EU?

kittikitti 7mo ago

American here, I would much rather have China being the foremost power too. This saga with Anthropic shows just how clueless these AI companies are. This soap opera has to stop, none of these CEO's, officials from the Trump administration, or the Department of War are good for humanity. I've read the ethics policies that China that they released on generative AI and it's years ahead of anything we have in America. China's AI Safety Governance Framework: https://www.cac.gov.cn/2025-09/15/c_1759653448369123.htm https://www.cac.gov.cn/2025-09/15/c_1759653448369123.htm Most Americans hate AI and it's effectively the ostrich effect where they hope to outright ban it and ignore everything else. Meanwhile, all the evil people are running the show. While Anthropic continues to propagate Sinophobic messaging, DeepSeek and other companies have a much more muted tone.

base76 7mo ago
The cynicism is earned. But "nobody is good for humanity" is where analysis stops. What's actually happening is a jurisdictional split forming in real time. The US is pricing out companies that won't remove human oversight from weapons systems. That's not a soap opera — it's a policy signal with long-term consequences for where frontier AI development lands geographically. Europe isn't perfect. But it's the only major jurisdiction actively building the governance infrastructure to keep humans in the loop by law, not by goodwill. That matters when goodwill runs out — which, as you note, it tends to do. The people building that alternative aren't the CEOs in Washington. Worth knowing they exist.

poszlem 7mo ago

They are literally doing what China has already done. In what world would China be a better option here?

GeorgeWBasic 7mo ago
In this world, the one where China isn't invading its neighbors and overthrowing governments all around the world.