Am i the only one who understands the deparments position? Like if another country will have it without safeguards, why would I not want it without safeguards.

Am i the only one who understands the deparments position? Like if another country will have it without safeguards, why would I not want it without safeguards. I can still be the safeguard, but having safeguards enforced by another entity that potentially has to face negative financial consequences seems like a disadvantage, would be weird to accept that as department of war. I understand the risk, but that is the pill.