3 ms·
Was it ever confirmed that Anthropic did paid astroturfing? Or is this organic?
by TZubiri 8mo ago
Was it ever confirmed that Anthropic did paid astroturfing? Or is this organic?
- ghqst 8mo agoI think this is organic. I've observed the exact same thing over the last week: I tried Google Antigravity and really liked it when I was using my Claude quota. I ran out of Claude quota and tried Gemini 3.1 Pro and it was comparatively terrible at using the tools provided by the IDE. (but it's a useful model in the browser for chat)
- pinkmuffinere 8mo ago+1, Claude is just better for me.
- tayo42 8mo agoCould be both? I've been leaning more towards claude. A lot of the LLM tropes seem to be ChatGPT really? I feel like claude doesn't do as much of the overly intense "its this -- not that" pattern and isn't constantly acting like my hype man. Claude code has been nice 90% of the time. I haven't tried to many competitors though.
- scuff3d 8mo agoGiven my own experiences with LLMs, I'm convinced about half the comments on any given thread are just bots told to hype <insert_product_here>
- bigbadfeline 8mo agoThat's about right, my estimate is 50% to 70% depending on case. On the other hand, isn't it clear that people will be more productive with whatever agent they have experience with? That's my reason for going with open source agents and the attempts of Big LLM to kill that workflow only reaffirm my decision.
- scuff3d 8mo agoWhat are you using currently?
- junofan 8mo agoThe article is AI-generated at least.