3 ms·
The article author claims AI was not used to write the article. Personally I believe them, considering the content of the article.
by margalabargala 8mo ago
The article author claims AI was not used to write the article.
Personally I believe them, considering the content of the article.
- Doc-Bok 8mo agoFor what it's worth, my AI content blocker blocked the article.
- qsi 8mo agoMaybe because it quotes (at length) AI-generated output?
- st-keller 8mo agoHappens a lot to highly reasonable, well written texts without orthographical errors.
- alex_smart 8mo agoIt’s worth nothing, to the point it makes people wonder why you even volunteer that information.
- qsi 8mo agoThe article as written is entirely consistent with John Cochrane's style. I have been reading him off and on over the years so I think I have a decent baseline for comparison. It doesn't smell of AI to me. If anything, even the included quotes from Refine don't smell much of typical AI, but maybe I am less discerning there. I did notice the em-dashes though!
- throw310822 8mo agoWe flew past the Turing test so brilliantly that now people have to try to convince interviewers that they're real.