4 ms·
Just look at the dates of the cited articles. 2023, 2024: that's prehistory, before thinking models anyway. It's like concluding that humans don't understand ar
by throw310822 8mo ago
Just look at the dates of the cited articles. 2023, 2024: that's prehistory, before thinking models anyway. It's like concluding that humans don't understand arithmetic because they can't multiply large numbers at sight.
- simianwords 8mo agoi don't get the point of using that in a paper today
- throw310822 8mo agoI'm not sure what the paper is really about despite the enthusiasm of the LLM haters here. Certainly there isn't something called "LLMs" that stayed reasonably the same in the last 4 years- GPT-2 is an LLM but a finding on it most likely doesn't apply to Opus 4.6. You can't document a failure on a 2024 model and claim "LLMs can't do this".