4 ms·
> Similar story for lower levels of confidence therefore, the polymarket betting odds will reflect the truth - even if that info is a secret that nobody else
by chii 8mo ago
> Similar story for lower levels of confidence
therefore, the polymarket betting odds will reflect the truth - even if that info is a secret that nobody else but the insider knows. And if this is the case, then even an outsider could make use of the odds as a source of info which would ensure that market efficiency (which is about the flow of information) is high.
So what's wrong with insider trading again?
- wqaatwt 8mo agoThat someone with inside information will e.g. make 500% while those late to the party e.g. only get 10%? (of course your example is not very realistic to begin with)
- nubg 8mo agoSo is any kind of business illegal? Making investments?
- mminer237 8mo agoIt rewards blatant corruption? What's the benefit is the bigger question.
- 0x3f 8mo agoThe benefit is that inside information becomes public information. The reward for the insider is just the necessary incentive for that to happen.
- a2128 8mo agoHas there ever been any documented circumstance where significant inside information became public and known thanks to a trade? Most often, the trade is made at the last minute, and the information gets subsequently revealed anyway. And it's impossible to tell whether somebody is an inside trader, a wealthy gambling addict making a stupid decision, or hypothetically a foreign agent pretending to be an inside trader to make people believe in a particular outcome.
- 0x3f 8mo agoIt's impossible to know anything for certain; almost everything is probabilistic. Also I'm not sure how to interpret your criteria because timing matters, I don't think saying 'it gets revealed in the end' is very meaningful. Anyway, on Polymarket specifically, sure, military strikes are a common one. Seems like a useful signal to go hide in the basement. Outside Polymarket, there were insider trades in 2008 that I'm sure were useful.
- yowayb 8mo agoHow is this distinguishable from pump-dump?
- hibikir 8mo agoThe issue comes from situations where the insiders can alter the answer to help their own bets. The simple example is the bet on how long a press conference will be: It's a ridiculous bet when the person giving said press conference can bet and fleece the market. Will X country invade another before or after day X? A large enough market changes the answer, as the agent can change the decision. And we can see this kind of thing in many interesting questions.
- 0x3f 8mo agoThese are not secret divinations though, the participants know this and price it in or otherwise allow it to determine which markets they participate in.
- MrMan 8mo ago[dead]
- a2128 8mo agoIf you believe Polymarket as a serious source of truth, consider that somebody manipulated "Will Jesus Christ return before 2027?" because there was a secondary market on whether that market will rise above 5%. Which defeats the whole idea that the betting odds will reflect the truth. Also even pre-manipulation I don't think a 2% chance that Jesus will return was reflective of truth. https://gizmodo.com/checking-in-on-polymarket-bets-on-christs-return-jump-on-bets-that-bets-on-christs-return-will-jump-2000720298 https://gizmodo.com/checking-in-on-polymarket-bets-on-christ...