4 ms·
no, more precisely, they can actively think about it and still believe it's not an issue. For example they can justify that the migrant workers are given a cho
by itemize123 8mo ago
no, more precisely, they can actively think about it and still believe it's not an issue.
For example they can justify that the migrant workers are given a choice etc or it's better than some of their alternative.
- eru 8mo agoIf it's not clear: that's pretty close to what I believe, yes. Calling the opposite position 'out of sight, out of mind' or 'The Copenhagen Interpretation of Ethics' kind of gives my disdain for it away, I thought?