4 ms·
I agree with you that the migrant workers are effectively a serf class. However, I think it's fine that the SG government severely discourages owning a car. It'
by FredFS456 8mo ago
I agree with you that the migrant workers are effectively a serf class. However, I think it's fine that the SG government severely discourages owning a car. It's a small island with lots of people, there would be gridlock if everyone wanted their own car. The public transportation system is amazing and works well.
- SV_BubbleTime 8mo agoI promise you do not need to explain scarcity to me :) the issue is that the disparity between I can’t afford a car, and I will never be able to afford a car is vast. The slave class exist to do nothing but serve (be on the street at 2300, it’s poor people running power washers everywhere you go). The entire country runs on Chinese goods in shipping containers going to the US. It’s a tax state. Don’t get me wrong, unique place, I loved it. But ya, not what it seems, lah.
- eru 8mo ago> The entire country runs on Chinese goods in shipping containers going to the US. It’s a tax state. If that's true: tell me, why do people in the US or China pay for an expensive transit in Singapore? > (be on the street at 2300, it’s poor people running power washers everywhere you go). What?
- ii41 8mo ago> disparity between I can’t afford a car, and I will never be able to afford a car is vast There's no disparity. Either way you're not going to own a car any time soon. You're not freer when the legal system prevents you to do something because you don't have enough money than when the legal system prevents you from doing that thing for other reasons.
- eru 8mo ago> I agree with you that the migrant workers are effectively a serf class. Sounds like the Copenhagen Interpretation of Ethics? Or 'out of sight, out of mind'?
- itemize123 8mo agonot everyone has the same ethics or even subscribes to that
- eru 8mo agoExactly, some people think 'out of sight, out of mind' is great ethics! See https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/QXpxioWSQcNuNnNTy/the-copenhagen-interpretation-of-ethics https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/QXpxioWSQcNuNnNTy/...
- itemize123 8mo agono, more precisely, they can actively think about it and still believe it's not an issue. For example they can justify that the migrant workers are given a choice etc or it's better than some of their alternative.
- eru 8mo agoIf it's not clear: that's pretty close to what I believe, yes. Calling the opposite position 'out of sight, out of mind' or 'The Copenhagen Interpretation of Ethics' kind of gives my disdain for it away, I thought?