4 ms·
The whole article reads like a puff piece for Zuckerberg/meta. They had him on the stand and these were the most interesting questions and answers? I feel like
by fusslo 8mo ago
The whole article reads like a puff piece for Zuckerberg/meta.
They had him on the stand and these were the most interesting questions and answers? I feel like the WSJ is trying to convince me facebook is a good company trying its best and Zuckerberg is a reasonable empathetic person.
- reactordev 8mo agoThat’s exactly the lens they were hoping for
- fusslo 8mo agoI guess so, I expected a little more nuance to hide it better. but it was just blatant. like any child could figure it out
- Tostino 8mo agoPlenty of adults don't catch it either. You don't need to be blatant. Dress it up in neutral business language, keep the arguments one step removed from the conclusion, and anchor it in assumptions people already hold about markets and American institutions. Then it's nearly impossible to push back on without sounding like you're attacking the premises.
- reactordev 8mo agoThe journalistic version of the “I’m kidnapped” hand signal.
- ai4prezident 8mo agoWsj is always pro-corporate
- dlev_pika 8mo agoThat’s what the WSJ is there for
- soperj 8mo agoThat's what Meta paid for.
- rand846633 8mo agoPlz enlighten me about the payment. As in meta bought advertisement in wsj?
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 8mo agohttps://paulgraham.com/submarine.html https://paulgraham.com/submarine.html
- anjel 8mo agoYou were expecting it to be fair and balanced? What's speaks volumes on murdoch is the WSJ will criticize trump in ways that are heresy on foxnews.